Calculating net force on four masses around a center mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net gravitational force on a central sphere from four surrounding masses arranged in a square. The radius used for calculations was initially determined incorrectly as 11.31 m instead of the correct 8 cm. Participants provided individual gravitational force calculations for each mass, emphasizing the importance of using SI units. There was confusion about breaking down the forces into unit vector notation, specifically the i and j components, and whether the j components of the forces are identical. The conversation highlighted the efficiency of recognizing common factors in the gravitational equations to simplify calculations.
rockchalk1312
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
In the figure, a square of edge length 16.0 cm is formed by four spheres of masses m1 = 4.50 g, m2 = 2.80 g, m3 = 0.800 g, and m4 = 4.50 g. In unit-vector notation, what is the net gravitational force from them on a central sphere with mass m5 = 2.10 g?


F = G (m1m2/r2)


To get the radius as a diagonal I used pythagorean's theorem to calculate √162+162=11.31m.

I've solved that the force on m1 due to the center particle is (6.67E-11)(4.50 x 2.10/11.312) = 4.93E-12.

Solving the same way as above:

force on m2: 3.06E-12

force on m3: 8.76E-13

force on m4: 4.93E-12 (same mass as m1)

Was that the right radius to use in the law of universal gravitational equation?

Now that I have those I don't know how to break them into unit vector notation and find the net force? Help please? Figure attached.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-04-14 at 11.01.53 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-04-14 at 11.01.53 PM.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write down a unit vector pointing from the central mass to m1?
Btw, you could have made things easier by recognising that each force has a factor mi, all else being the same. So you could have added up four vectors representing the four masses, then multiplied that by Gm5/(2d2)
 
rockchalk1312 said:
To get the radius as a diagonal I used pythagorean's theorem to calculate √162+162=11.31m.

You'll need to use 8cm for this calculation instead of 16cm.

I've solved that the force on m1 due to the center particle is (6.67E-11)(4.50 x 2.10/11.312) = 4.93E-12.

Be careful with your units here. To get the force in N, you'll need to use SI units for the other quantities.
 
haruspex said:
Can you write down a unit vector pointing from the central mass to m1?
Btw, you could have made things easier by recognising that each force has a factor mi, all else being the same. So you could have added up four vectors representing the four masses, then multiplied that by Gm5/(2d2)

Well what I don't know how to do is break up a diagonally pointing force into i and j components.

And by "has a factor mi", do you mean that the j component of each force is the same? If so why is that? Would you just add up the four vectors' i components and multiply that by the equation you gave above?
 
rockchalk1312 said:
Well what I don't know how to do is break up a diagonally pointing force into i and j components.

You just have to find the x- and y-components of the force. These are the i and j components.

And by "has a factor mi", do you mean that the j component of each force is the same? If so why is that? Would you just add up the four vectors' i components and multiply that by the equation you gave above?

haruspex was just trying to save you some effort by noticing that all 4 force equations have a common term Gm5/r2
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top