Calculating Orbit Parameters Given Perigee Velocity and Period

AI Thread Summary
A satellite in Earth orbit with a perigee velocity of 8 km/s and a period of 2 hours requires calculations for its orbit parameters, including altitude at perigee. The vis viva equation is suggested for more accurate results, as the initial equation provided is only valid for circular orbits. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the semi-major axis and eccentricity, with incorrect calculations leading to negative eccentricity values. Clarifications emphasize that specific angular momentum and semi-major axis are distinct, requiring different units. Accurate calculations are crucial for determining the satellite's orbital characteristics.
dorai007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

i can't seem to find the answer .

A satellite in Earth orbit has a perigee velocity of 8 km=s and period of 2 hours. From this information,
determine all the orbit parameters that you can. From those parameters, determine its altitude at perigee
--------------------------------------------------------

my vp=8km/sec
T=7200sec
Vp=sqrt(GM/r)---is this right and is r =rp?





how do i calculate my semi major axis? is it from kepler's 3rd law? I am stuck at finding rp and eccenctricity and I've been going at this for hours without proper examples in books/online.

Someone please help!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
dorai007 said:
Vp=sqrt(GM/r)---is this right and is r =rp?
That equation is valid only for circular orbits. The vis viva equation provides a more general answer:

\frac{v^2}{GM} = \frac 2 r - \frac 1 a
how do i calculate my semi major axis? is it from kepler's 3rd law?
Correct. So show some work so we can help you out a bit.
 
but if its vis viva will my eccentricity value be more than 0.2..thats the value I am getting, this is how I am doing my calculations

1) equation 1 : mag(h)=mag(rp)*mag(v)
equation 2: mag(rp)= [mag(h)^2/GM]/(1+ecos(v) - trajectory eqn
equation 3: T= 2phi/sqrt(GM) * (mag(h))^3/2

i am to solve 3 unknowns mag(h),rp and e by simultaneous eqns by substituting all the equations into one another.

ive done it a couple of times, either I am getting a negative value for e(-0.1) which shldnt be the case.

But my qn here is. if v=8000m/sec what is mag(v)? and in this case will a=mag(h) ?
 
dorai007 said:
but if its vis viva will my eccentricity value be more than 0.2..thats the value I am getting,
Then you are doing it wrong. The eccentricity is less than 0.2. Show your work.

this is how I am doing my calculations

1) equation 1 : mag(h)=mag(rp)*mag(v)
equation 2: mag(rp)= [mag(h)^2/GM]/(1+ecos(v) - trajectory eqn
equation 3: T= 2phi/sqrt(GM) * (mag(h))^3/2
Your equation 1 is only valid for circular orbits, and for elliptical orbits at perifocus and apofocus. (Since the given data point is perigee, this equation is okay here.) Your equation 3 however is only valid for circular orbits.

Try finding a formula that relates semi-major axis (rather than specific angular momentum) to the period.

But my qn here is. if v=8000m/sec what is mag(v)? and in this case will a=mag(h) ?
The magnitude of the velocity vector is of course 8000m/s. As far as a=mag(h), no. Look at the units. Specific angular momentum(h) has units of length2/time. Semi-major axis (a) has units of length.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top