Calculating Orbital Velocity Ratios for Planets A and B

AI Thread Summary
Planet A and Planet B are in circular orbits around a star, with Planet A being 8.5 times farther from the star than Planet B. The initial approach to calculate their velocity ratio using the force equation F=1/r^2 is incorrect, as it does not account for the relationship between velocity and radius in circular motion. The correct method indicates that the square of the orbital velocity is inversely proportional to the radius of the orbit. Therefore, the velocity ratio Va/Vb can be calculated as the square root of the inverse of their distance ratio, resulting in Va/Vb = Sqrt(1/8.5), which equals approximately 0.35. This highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of circular orbits in gravitational fields.
mariners02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Planet A and planet B are in circular orbits around a distant star. Planet A is 8.5 times farther from the star than is planet B. What is the ratio of their speeds Va/Vb

This problem seems very simple, thought i could just use F=1/r^2, find the difference in forces, which would also be the difference in velocity. Can anyone explain the error in my thinking?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mariners02 said:
Planet A and planet B are in circular orbits around a distant star. Planet A is 8.5 times farther from the star than is planet B. What is the ratio of their speeds Va/Vb

This problem seems very simple, thought i could just use F=1/r^2, find the difference in forces, which would also be the difference in velocity. Can anyone explain the error in my thinking?

The problem is that the force is proportional to the velocity squared divided by the radius. Thus the velocity squared is proportional to the inverse of the radius.
 
So i could just do V=Sqrt(1/8.5)=.35?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Back
Top