Calculating Specific Charge: U-238 Example

AI Thread Summary
Specific charge is defined as charge divided by mass, and for neutral atoms like U-238, the overall charge is zero due to equal numbers of protons and electrons. When discussing specific charge, it is important to consider ionized atoms, as ionization results in a non-zero specific charge. The charge referred to in the calculation is the net charge of the atom after accounting for any ionization. For U-238, the specific charge can be calculated once its ionization state is established. Neutral atoms do not have a specific charge, while charged atoms will have a specific charge based on their excess charge relative to their mass.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am having trouble understanding how to calculate specific charge. I know that it is charge/mass.

But what charge are they referring to? For instance an atom may be charged + or - and may not be charged at all. In that instance are we referring to the extra charge that exceeds the positive or negative charge?

What is the specific charge of a U-238?

Please show me some work outs. especially showing for charged and uncharged atoms. (assuming uncharged contains extra protons or electrons)

...or is it neutral atoms do not apply.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do all nuclei have equal number of protons and electrons therefore are not charged at all. I mean when they initially they write the atom symbol showing the atomic number and nucleon number without showing the number of electrons.
 
"Charge" is the charge of the whole object you are considering. Neutral objects have a specific charge of zero. If you ionize the U-238, it gets a non-zero specific charge.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top