Calculating the Commutator of x and p - Problem Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter lihurricane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
lihurricane
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i have met a problem about the commutator of x and p.
[x,p]=ihbar

/p> is the eigenstate of momentum operator p.

<p/xp-px/p>

=<p/xp/p>-<p/px/p>

=p<p/x/p>-p<p/x/p> the second term is got by the momentum operator p acting on
the left state.

=0

so i get zero! is there anyone can point out where i am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you calculate <p|x|p>? Which number will you get? I can tell you: any number you want, depending on how you decide to calculate it. You are playing pseudo-math with formal expressions without really understanding their mathematical meaning. That is how many paradoxes appear.

Many theorems in mathematics are valid under certain assumptions. Skip the assumptions, apply the theorem, and you can well create a paradox.
 
lihurricane said:
[...]
so i get zero! is there anyone can point out where i am wrong?

Take a look at Post #18 in this (very recent) thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=426509&page=2

More importantly, check out the references I mentioned. :-)
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top