Calculating the reflected power from solar radiation on the moon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total power of solar radiation reflected from the Moon, given its albedo of 0.05. The initial confusion arises from whether to use half of the Moon's surface area or its cross-sectional area for calculations. The correct approach is to multiply the solar flux density by the Moon's cross-sectional area, as this represents the sunlight falling perpendicularly onto a disc of the same diameter. This clarification helps resolve the misunderstanding about the area used in the calculation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how solar radiation interacts with celestial bodies.
mell0r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Question: The Moon has an albedo of 0.05. What is the total power of the solar radiation reflected from the Moon in units of 10^15 W?

My Answer: - To get my answer i multiplied the flux density of the sun measured on the moon, then multiplied it by half of the moon's total surface area, followed by the multiplication of the albedo value.

However, the mark scheme reads: 'Flux density of the Sun as seen on Moon times the cross-sectional area of the moon gives the total power of the solar radiation incident on the Moon. Multiplied by the albedo gives you the total power reflected.'

Could anybody explain why i should multiply by the cross-sectional area rather than half of the moon's surface area?

Cheers in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mell0r! :smile:
mell0r said:
Could anybody explain why i should multiply by the cross-sectional area rather than half of the moon's surface area?

because the total sunlight falling on the moon is the same as that falling perpendicularly onto a flat disc of the same diameter as the moon :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
because the total sunlight falling on the moon is the same as that falling perpendicularly onto a flat disc of the same diameter as the moon :wink:

Thanks for such a sudden reply! :smile: It seems so obvious now, but my mind would just not accept it at the time haha... Thanks to the help of a handy ping pong ball lying around the house it's overcome it though now :-p
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top