Calculating Time for Turntable Platter to Stop at 0rpm

  • Thread starter Thread starter utility_belt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Turntable
AI Thread Summary
To model the stopping time of a turntable platter after power is cut, the coefficient of friction between the platter and the turntable is essential. Without friction, the platter would not stop, making it a critical factor for calculations. Users can measure the friction force using a scale or time how long it takes to stop to derive the coefficient. In this case, the average stopping time was measured at 15 seconds, and the initial velocity was converted to radians per second. The formula to find the coefficient of friction involves using gravitational acceleration (g), which is approximately 9.81 m/s².
utility_belt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I haven't studied rotational physics in a long time so this may be a stupid question, but here goes. I'm trying to model the properties of a turntable (record player). Using the theories of rotational motion, is it possible to calculate the time it would take for the spinning turntable platter to come to a complete stop when the power to the motor is cut?

Given that I know the starting velocity is 33 rpm, the final velocity is 0rpm and the weight of the platter is 1.996kg is it possible to calculate the time it takes to come to a complete stop?

Thanks for you help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but you would need to know the coefficient of friction between the turntable and the platter. If there were no friction, the platter would never stop. Once you have the magnitude of the friction force you can find the angular deceleration of the platter and how long it would take for its angular velocity to become 0.
 
Ah yes, I thought that would be the missing factor. I assume this (the friction between the turntable and the platter) is something that is not so easy to measure/calculate?
 
If you can find such a turntable, it is very easy to calculate. Just measure how much force it takes to turn it. All you need is a small scale.

The other thing you could do is to time how long it takes to come to a stop. With a little algebraic manipulation you can solve the equation for the coefficient of friction.

Or you could guess. Maybe around .1 ? Does it have bearings?
-Mike
 
Last edited by a moderator:
V(t) = V_0 + at
In our case the platter stops so V(t) is zero:
t = -\frac{V_0}{a}
(a will also be negative so the time will be positive.)

Finding a is just a matter of: (fk being kinetic friction)
\Sigma F = ma = -f_k = -N\mu = -mg\mu
a = -g\mu

Plug that into the formula above:
t = \frac{V_0}{g\mu}
And you're done. :smile:
Or if you have the time and want to find the coefficient of friction:
\mu = \frac{V_0}{gt}
 
OK,

Thanks Chen. I've measured the time it takes for the turntable to stop, and get an average of about 15 seconds. I'm trying to put that into your last formula, to find the coefficient of friction but am unsure of a couple of variables.

V(0) Velocity is 33.33 rpm so = 3.49 rad/s
t Time is = 15s

So that would make: Coefficient = 3.49 / (g * 15)

Stupid question, what is g?
Thanks.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top