Calculating Torque for a Rectangular Prism Robot

AI Thread Summary
To maintain the orientation of a rectangular prism robot with a mass of 1kg and dimensions of 10cm high, 2cm wide, and 2cm long, a torque of approximately 1.3 kg.cm is required when the body is rotated Pi/12 radians forward. If the wheels are glued to the ground, this torque can counteract the rotational force effectively. However, if the wheels can spin, the torque will cause the robot to accelerate rather than maintain position, leading to challenges in balance. The discussion highlights the importance of considering factors like aerodynamic drag and friction when calculating the required torque over time. Ultimately, a torque function is sought to restore balance within one second without resulting in linear or rotational velocity.
NohtSmrt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A robot has a rectangular prism for a body. The body is 10cm high, 2cm wide, 2cm long, has a mass of 1kg and it’s mass is uniformly distributed. An axle bisects the bottom face of the body. On each side of the body is a wheel that rotates on the axle. The wheels have a radius of 1cm and have no mass. The body is rotated Pi/12 radians forward, (on the same axis as the axle). What torque needs to be applied at the axle to maintain the body’s orientation?

If the wheels are glued the ground I think the answer is…

Sin[Pi/12].1Kg.5cm
Or about 1.3Kg.cm

But if the wheels can spin, does that change the answer? (Assume that it's already moving as fast as needs to; there won't be any acceleration)

I'm actually building a similar robot and would like work out all the dynamics, but for the moment I'm ignoring as much as possible (fricition, inertia, etc...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right that the required torque is: sin[pi/12].1Kg.5cm
and this will also be required to keep the robot in this position if the wheels can spin.
However, there is a practical problem if the wheels can spin: the torque will "try" to rotate the axle with the wheels, if the wheels are glued to the ground there is no problem because an elastic force inside the glue will counteract this force and prevent the wheels from turning (and the robot from falling), if the wheels are not glued to the ground the wheels will turn and because you have to maintain the torque the robot just has to accelerate… because constant torque in this case means constant rotational acceleration…
 
Thanks for your reply.

I've talked to others and come to similar conclusion.

constant torque in this case means constant rotational acceleration

And if the wheels are rolling (not sliding) this will mean constant linear acceleration. But if we consider aerodynamic drag, then there will be a velocity at which the drag will balance friction between the wheels and the ground generated by the torque at the axle.

Ultimately I want to come up with a torque function F(t) where t is time that will put the robot back into balance by t = 1s. As well as finishing with no linear or rotational velocity.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top