Calculating Travel Time for Commuter Train

  • Thread starter Thread starter miscellaneous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Train Travel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total travel time for a commuter train traveling 0.90 km between two stations, utilizing both acceleration and deceleration phases. The user applied kinematic equations to determine the final velocity (Vf) of 16 m/s and calculated the time taken during acceleration (80 seconds) and deceleration (32 seconds), resulting in a total travel time of 112 seconds. Other participants confirmed the method and calculations, indicating that the approach was correct. The conversation emphasizes breaking the motion into two segments with different accelerations and using appropriate kinematic formulas for each segment. Overall, the calculations and methodology were validated by peers in the discussion.
miscellaneous
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A commuter train can minimize the time t between two stations by accelerating (a1 = .20 m/s^2) for a time t1, then undergoing a negative acceleration (a2 = -.5 m/s^2) by using his brakes for a time t2. Since the stations are .90 km apart, the train never reaches its maximum velocity. Find the total travel time, t.

My method:

deltaS= (Vf^2-Vo^2)/2a
900= (Vf^2/.4) + (Vf^2)
900= 2.5Vf^2 + Vf^2
Vf= 16 m/s

and then I used: Vf = Vo + at
16= .2t
t=80 s

0= 16 - .5t
t=32 s

total t= 112 seconds

Can anyone please confirm this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
miscellaneous said:
My method:

deltaS= (Vf^2-Vo^2)/2a
900= (Vf^2/.4) + (Vf^2)
900= 2.5Vf^2 + Vf^2
Vf= 16 m/s
900 m is the entire distance. Note that the initial and final speeds are both zero over the 900 m.

Break the motion into two pieces, each with a different acceleration. Use that same kinematic formula, but for each piece separately. (The first piece goes from v = 0 to v = V1; the second goes from v = V1 to v = 0.)
 
I think that's what I did. Is my answer incorrect? I'm pretty sure my method is what you explained. If I'm wrong, please let me know. The Vf is the same as V1
 
miscellaneous said:
I think that's what I did. Is my answer incorrect? I'm pretty sure my method is what you explained. If I'm wrong, please let me know. The Vf is the same as V1
Looks good. (I missed what you did, at first look.)
 
Ohh, thanks for the confirmation. I'm really happy I know what I'm doing :approve:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top