Calculating Upward Support Force on a Rigid Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter guru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Force
AI Thread Summary
A 3.0-meter rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at both ends, with an 80 kg student positioned 2.0 meters from one support. The weight of the student is calculated to be 784N, and the weight of the beam is 980N. The upward force exerted by support 1 was initially miscalculated, as the moments caused by both the student and the beam were not properly considered. The correct calculation involves using the equation (2x784) + (1.5x980) = 3xF, leading to the upward force at support 1 being determined as 751.33N after accounting for the total downward forces. Acknowledgment of the beam's weight was crucial for arriving at the accurate force exerted by the supports.
guru
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A 3.0-m-long rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at each end. A
80 kg student stands 2.0 m from support 1. How much upward force does support 1 exert on the beam?

I first found the weight of the student to be 784N.
so 784N*2cm =F*3cm
F= 522.67N
is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N
 
DeathKnight said:
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N


Yes, I forgot to consider the weight of the beam.
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top