I Calculating Watt Hours for a time interval less than 1 second

AI Thread Summary
Using an online physics calculator can yield confusing results, especially when inputting time values less than one second for watt-hour calculations. The initial error message regarding negative values is misleading, as the calculator ultimately provides a result. The discussion highlights uncertainty about the unit "J watts hours" and the accuracy of the output, specifically the value of 0.1. A proper calculation shows that multiplying power (10W) by time (0.01s) and converting from joules to watt-hours results in approximately 27.8 micro watt-hours. Understanding the conversion process is crucial for accurate energy calculations.
pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Is it OK to put less than 1 second into the equation ?
I use an online physics calculator a lot to help me for various reasons. When I input less than 1 second into a watt hour calculation it initially tells me it can not be a negative value although that does disappear and it does do the calculation.

Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241111_232524_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241111_232524_Chrome.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 71
  • Screenshot_20241111_232347_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241111_232347_Chrome.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 50
Physics news on Phys.org
pete94857 said:
Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and pete94857
berkeman said:
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
It is an ambiguous interface. The answer is in joules.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes pete94857 and berkeman
pete94857 said:
TL;DR Summary: Is it OK to put less than 1 second into the equation ?

I use an online physics calculator a lot to help me for various reasons. When I input less than 1 second into a watt hour calculation it initially tells me it can not be a negative value although that does disappear and it does do the calculation.

Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
It doesn’t like zero, but greatery than zero seems ok. Watt-hours should be Energy.
 
berkeman said:
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
Power x time = Energy. Power is the required energy to power something, time is the amount of time needed and energy is the energy needed to perform the task at that time. Or reverse E/t=w
 
pete94857 said:
Power x time = Energy. Power is the required energy to power something, time is the amount of time needed and energy is the energy needed to perform the task at that time. Or reverse E/t=w
Well, that didn't really answer my question, but I'll show you how to do it since I don't think this is a schoolwork-related question.

So to calculate the Energy based on power and time and convert units from W*s to W*hr:

$$E = 10W ~0.01s ~ \frac{1hr}{3600s} = 27.8\mu Whr $$

Note how I converted from W*s (Joules) to W*hr by multiplying by "1" in this form: ##1=\frac{1hr}{3600s}## to get the right cancellations of units from the initial answer to what I wanted. :wink:
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top