Calculating Zenith Angle for Nerf Gun Targeting

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomsiv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Gun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the zenith angle for a Nerf gun to accurately hit a target using a code developed in Matlab/Simulink. The code utilizes target coordinates (x, y, z) to determine the azimuth angle and the zenith angle based on projected range and elevation. Key equations involve changes in position along the range and z-axis, factoring in total velocity and drag. The challenge lies in solving these equations simultaneously for the zenith angle (θ) and time after firing (Δt), with suggestions made to simplify the matrix setup. The conversation highlights the complexity of the non-linear equations and explores methods to derive θ efficiently.
tomsiv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on my engineering capstone design and part of our design requires a code we have written to calculate the appropriate zenith angle for a nerf gun to fire a projectile so that the dart hits a certain target.

We are feeding the code a target coordinate (x,y,z). One section of our code tracks the azimuth angle simply using the x and y coordinates(arctan(y/x)), then the zenith angle will be based on the projected range (r = \sqrt{x^{2}+ y^{2}}) and the z value. The basic equations we are using are

Δr = vtotal*cos(θ)*Δt + .5*d*cos(θ)*Δt^{2}

Δz = vtotal*sin(θ)*Δt + .5*(d*sin(θ) + g)*Δt^{2}

where
Δr = change in position along the projected range
Δz = change in position along the z axis (elevation)
vtotal = total velocity (at muzzle)
Δt = time after firing
d = drag = -k*v2 = (we are going to assume this as a constant even though it depends on velocity)

Now since we are feeding our Matlab/simulink code a desired (x,y,z) value, we will have a desired Δr and Δz (or if you want to think in 2 dimensions a desired X and Y). So what we are trying to do is have our program solve these two equations simultaneously so that we can have a necessary θ value (zenith angle) to hit our target. Two equations, two unknowns (θ and Δt). I'm just running into problems when trying to set these up as a matrix to solve.

I feel like we may be over complicating this, because I've done similar calculations for rail gun targeting, but we had range, etc. as the unknowns and we were selecting theta values. Am I leaving something out or missing an obvious matrix solving method?

Thank you for any help you can offer, sorry if my wording is somewhat confusing.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "set these up as a matrix to solve"? Your equations are non-linear.
 
Yea, sorry, I realized that I had said that a little after posting my problem. I'm just trying to find the best way to solve for theta, using a method that can coded relatively easily (as far as computational time is concerned).
 
Multiple the second equation with ## \cos \theta ## and the first with ## \sin \theta ##; subtract the first from the second. You end up with ## \Delta z \cos \theta - \Delta r \sin \theta = 0.5 g \cos \theta \Delta t^2 ##. Divide this by ## \cos \theta ## and you obtain $$

\tan \theta = \frac {\Delta z - 0.5 g \Delta t^2} {\Delta r }

$$ bserve that $$ \cos \theta = \frac 1 { \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \theta} }$$ so the first equation becomes $$

\sqrt {\Delta r ^2 + \left(\Delta z - 0.5 g \Delta t^2\right)^2}
= v \Delta t + 0.5 d \Delta t^2 $$ which is equivalent to an algebraic equation of the fourth degree.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top