MHB Can 20(s - t) Be an Integer in a Quartic Equation with No Real Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining whether \(20(s-t)\) can be an integer given the quartic equation \((x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0\) has no real roots. It is established that for the equation to lack real roots, the discriminants of the quadratic factors must be negative, leading to the inequalities \(10s^2 < t\) and \(10t^2 < s\), which imply both \(s\) and \(t\) are positive. Further analysis shows that the maximum possible difference \(|s-t|\) is constrained to be less than \(1/20\), meaning \(20(s-t)\) must be less than \(1\). Since \(s\) and \(t\) are distinct, \(20(s-t)\) cannot equal zero, concluding that \(20(s-t)\) cannot be an integer.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I don't know how to solve the problem below because I found what we are asked to prove is a bit confusing to me and hence I don't know how to formulate a credible way to solve the problem correctly.

Problem:

Let $s\ne t$ be real numbers. The equation $(x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0$ has no real roots.

State with reason, if $20(s-t)$ is or isn't an integer.

But one can tell if the quartic equation (which is given in factored form, a product of two quadratic functions) has no real roots, then the discriminant of each quadratic function is less than zero. i.e.

$(20s)^2-4(1)(10t)<0$ and $(20t)^2-4(1)(10s)<0$

Subtracting these two inequalities yields

$20(t-s)(10s+10t+1)<0$ or

$20(s-t)(10s+10t+1)>0$ (*)

By expanding the given equation we have

$x^4+20(s+t)x^3+10(s+2st+t)x^2+200(s^2+t^2)x+100ts=0$ (**)

I spent over an hour trying my best to see what relations that (*) and (**) have but I don't know how to go any further...could someone please help me, please?:)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

anemone said:
Hi MHB,

I don't know how to solve the problem below because I found what we are asked to prove is a bit confusing to me and hence I don't know how to formulate a credible way to solve the problem correctly.

Problem:

Let $x\ne y$ be real numbers. The equation $(x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0$ has no real roots.

State with reason, if $20(s-t)$ is or isn't an integer.

But one can tell if the quartic equation (which is given in factored form, a product of two quadratic functions) has no real roots, then the discriminant of each quadratic function is less than zero. i.e.

$(20s)^2-4(1)(10t)<0$ and $(20t)^2-4(1)(10s)<0$
Those two inequalities say that $10s^2<t$ and $10t^2<s$. It follows that both $s$ and $t$ are positive. Take the square root of both sides in the second inequality, to get $\sqrt{10}t<\sqrt s.$ Therefore the point $(s,t)$ (and similarly the point $(t,s)$) must lie above the curve $y = 10x^2$ and below the curve $y = \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}}.$ Now use calculus to find the maximum value of $ \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}} - 10x^2.$ I found that the maximum occurs when $x = (16000)^{-1/3}$ and is equal to $\dfrac3{10(16)^{2/3}} \approx 0.04725.$ This is less than $1/20$, so it appears that $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer.
 
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

Hi Opalg,

Thank you very much for your guidance in this problem. I appreciate your help!:)
 
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

My previous answer was only partially correct (in fact, it was wrong). It was correct to say that the point $(s,t)$ has to lie in the interior of the region between the curves $y = 10x^2$ and $y = \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}}$. But it was quite wrong to look at the greatest vertical separation between these curves. What we actually need to do is to maximise the difference $|s-t|$. To do that, we need to find where the point $(s,t)$ is as far as possible from the diagonal $y=x$ (the line where $|s-t| = 0$). The way to do that is to find where the tangent to one of the curves is parallel to the diagonal. So we need to differentiate $y=10x^2$ and put the derivative equal to $1$. That gives $20x=1$. So the point $\bigl(\frac1{20},\frac1{40}\bigr)$ lies on the curve, and its coordinates differ by $1/20$. That is the maximum possible difference for $|s-t|$, and it only occurs on the boundary curves. But the inequalities $10s^2<t$ and $10t^2<s$ are strict, so the point $(s,t)$ must lie in the interior of the region between the curves. For any such interior point we must have $|s-t|<1/20$. It follows that $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer unless it is $0$. But the problem states that $s\ne t$ (actually, it says $x \ne y$ but since there is no $y$ in the problem I think that must be a misprint for $s\ne t$). Therefore $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top