Can a gyroscope be used to stabilize a levitating globe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sagitta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Project
AI Thread Summary
A student is working on a project to create a levitating globe and has explored methods to overcome Earnshaw's theorem, focusing on using eddy currents and a feedback circuit to control electromagnet strength. The feedback circuit is preferred for its potential stability, despite requiring more calculations and soldering. The student is intrigued by the possibility of using gyroscopic motion for stabilization but questions the feasibility of integrating a gyroscope within the globe without a spinning mechanism. Concerns are raised about the complexity of balancing a spinning interior with a static globe. Ultimately, the project will likely proceed with the feedback system approach for stability.
sagitta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a student and this semester I am doing a project in Experimental Physics class. We plan to make a levitating globe! We have already researched on methods of overcoming Earnshaw's theorem and chose two:

1) Using eddy currents to stabilize an object (conductor)
More or less simple design, but requires too much voltage.
2) Using a feedback circuit to control the strength of the electromagnet.
We have already found some SOP and will research more and figure out by ourselves. This 2nd method is currently chosen as the main one.

But I have been thinking about levitrons and how they use gyroscopic motion to create the equilibrium point... Usually it requires a spinning top, which is not convenient since we need to have a globe. But I was thinking about gyroscopes and this idea fascinates me.

Is it possible to somehow install a gyroscope inside the globe to stabilize the levitation? Is there sort of a gyroscope that doesn't need to be spinned beforehand like spinning tops?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
- Spinning magnets as support should be possible
- A spinning interior for a static globe... I think that needs an additional motor in the globe, and it sounds tricky to balance.
 
Spinning magnets? By "support" you mean as a base or the globe?.. Because I think the globe is supposed to be static...
I guess we'll stick to the feedback systems, they require some soldering and more calculations but seem to provide more stability.

Thank you for the reply!
 
The base, which allows levitation of the globe.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top