Can a hypothesis be partially verified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the verification of a hypothesis stating that values exhibit a linear trend before plateauing. The data showed a linear trend but did not reach a plateau, leading to questions about whether the hypothesis is supported, falsified, or partially supported. One viewpoint suggests the hypothesis could be seen as partially correct, as the linear trend is supported while the plateau prediction is not. There is also a consideration that extending the measurement range might eventually reveal the plateau. Ultimately, the conclusion leans towards the hypothesis being partially supported based on the current data.
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I have a practical report and I have a hypothesis which basically states that the values exhibit a linear trend before eventually plateauing (levelling out).

The graph did exhibit a linear trend but it did not plateau. Does this mean my hypothesis has been supported, falsified or partially supported?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would be inclined to say that your hypothesis was partially correct. I wonder, however, if perhaps your hypothesis isn't a conglomeration of two separate hypotheses. The first, predicting a linear trend, is supported by your data, while the second, predicting a plateau, is falsified.
 
Mayn't you reach that plateau if extending the measurement range?

ehild
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top