Can a Magnetron Effectively Propel Protons in Linac Design?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using a magnetron to propel protons in a linac design. The original poster seeks guidance but lacks specific details about the linac's frequency, geometry, and operational mode. Respondents emphasize the importance of this information to determine if the magnetron's RF pulses can effectively match the linac's requirements. The complexity of linac design is highlighted, indicating that more research and understanding are needed. Overall, the conversation underscores the necessity for detailed technical specifications in accelerator design.
DLHill
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I am designing a linac and I need some help. I would like to have protons as the particles I will accelerate, but for the propulsion I was told that using a magnetron to pulse an intense RF would be good. Will this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DLHill said:
Hello everyone,
I am designing a linac and I need some help. I would like to have protons as the particles I will accelerate, but for the propulsion I was told that using a magnetron to pulse an intense RF would be good. Will this work?

You didn't provide enough information. For example, this linac that you have, what fundamental frequency/mode does it work at, and is this matched by the RF from the magnetron? Is this an iris-loaded linac, or some other type?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
You didn't provide enough information. For example, this linac that you have, what fundamental frequency/mode does it work at, and is this matched by the RF from the magnetron? Is this an iris-loaded linac, or some other type?

Zz.

I haven't actually made it yet. Just making some designs. But, it will be around the 6 MeV range and the RF pulses will be about 2.6 MW
 
DLHill said:
I haven't actually made it yet. Just making some designs. But, it will be around the 6 MeV range and the RF pulses will be about 2.6 MW

This doesn't have the necessary info to know if it will work. You provided no info on the working frequency, the geometry of the linac and the field, etc. Did you use an EM field code to model the field of the linac? Is this a pi mode? A pi/2 mode cavity?

Designing a linac isn't trivial by any stretch of the imagination.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
This doesn't have the necessary info to know if it will work. You provided no info on the working frequency, the geometry of the linac and the field, etc. Did you use an EM field code to model the field of the linac? Is this a pi mode? A pi/2 mode cavity?

Designing a linac isn't trivial by any stretch of the imagination.

Zz.

I'm sorry, but I am fairly new to working with linacs, so I cannot provide a lot of information about it. I am only trying to find some plausible ideas for propelling the protons. I will read more into everything to provide more information for you.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top