Can a sudden blow truly change potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
A sudden blow does not change potential energy because potential energy is dependent on position, which does not change instantaneously. The duration of the blow is negligible, meaning there is insufficient time for any significant displacement to occur. As a result, while the speed may increase, the position relative to the pivot remains effectively unchanged. Therefore, the potential energy remains constant during such a brief interaction. This understanding clarifies why potential energy is unaffected by a sudden force.
Lil123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 2-kg mass on a frictionless table is attached to one end of a
massless spring. The other end of the spring is held by a frictionless
pivot. The spring produces a force of magnitude 3r newtons
on the mass, where r is the distance in meters from the pivot to the
mass. The mass moves in a circle and has a total energy of 12 J.The mass is struck by a sudden sharp blow, giving it
instantaneous velocity of 1 m/s radially outward.
Relevant Equations
E =kinetic energy +potential energy
Why there will be no change in potential energy due to this sharp blow ? Potential energy is a function of position , so won't this position get changed due to this sharp blow?Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230929-090153_Samsung Notes.jpg
    Screenshot_20230929-090153_Samsung Notes.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 100
Physics news on Phys.org
Lil123 said:
Why there will be no change in potential energy due to this sharp blow ? Potential energy is a function of position , so won't this position get changed due to this sharp blow?
What is your reasoning for saying that "there will be no change in potential energy"?
 
There is no instantaneous change in its PE, since its distance from the pivot does does not change instantly; only its speed from the pivot does.
 
@haruspex So, is it correct to say that mass doesn't have enough time to change its potential energy due to this sudden blow
 
Lil123 said:
@haruspex So, is it correct to say that mass doesn't have enough time to change its potential energy due to this sudden blow
Yes. The intent of "sudden" is that the duration is negligible. If it lasts ##\Delta t## and produces a velocity ##v## then the displacement during the blow is, roughly, ##v\Delta t##. If ##\Delta t## is negligible then so is the displacement.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top