I Can an enclosure surrounding a Tx antenna act as a receiving antenna?

AI Thread Summary
Wiring a metal cuboid as an antenna poses significant challenges due to its inability to generate differential currents and voltages necessary for effective transmission. Unlike dipole antennas, a cuboid lacks the required structure to function properly without modifications, such as introducing a slot to allow electromagnetic fields to be detected. An ideal enclosure would reflect radiated fields and present a pure reactance to the transmitter, preventing power delivery. Real-world applications must consider imperfections, like leakage, to achieve functional antenna performance. Understanding these limitations is crucial for designing effective antenna systems.
genekuli
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
If I put a metal enclosure, eg. cuboid, around a Tx antenna, can the metal enclosure, since it is completely surrounding the antenna, act as a receiver (a receiving antenna) even if it is not of any specific dimension relating to the frequency of the TX antenna radiation within it?
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genekuli said:
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
That's the key point, I believe. How are you going to wire up a metal cuboid to act as an antenna? An antenna develops a receive voltage at its output terminals as a result of the EM radiation generating differential currents and hence differential voltages. A cuboid doesn't have 2 halves like a dipole, and if you try to use it as a monopole with respect to a ground plane, I don't think the Tx antenna inside it will generate any differential currents or voltages with respect to the ground plane.

Do you have a particular application in mind? If you describe the application, we may be able to suggest some antenna geometries that could work. Or is this just a question that came up as you were learning about EM and antennas?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and genekuli
For the 'enclosure' to do other than just reflect the radiated fields, it needs to have a break in it (a slot, for instance) so that an EMF can be detected across it.
So if your enclosure is 'ideal' (silver plated and welded all around) then the transmitting antenna will present to the transmitter as a pure reactance with no resistance. It would give most transmitters a headache as it could deliver no power.

This is one of those irrisistable force meets an immovable object type questions. In real life, the setup can't exist so you'd have to allow some imperfection, like leakage through the enclosure. Once you do that, you can calculate some sort of a real answer.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top