Can an Expanding Ball in an Ideal Fluid Affect Distant Areas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asheg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of a growing ball in an ideal fluid, questioning whether this scenario contradicts the fluid's incompressibility. It is suggested that if the fluid is truly incompressible, distant areas would instantly sense changes due to the ball's expansion. However, if compressibility is considered, acoustic waves might propagate from the ball. The conversation also touches on the Navier-Stokes equations, emphasizing that the zero divergence condition applies to fluid parcels, not including the volume of the expanding ball. Overall, the interaction between the ball's growth and the fluid's properties raises complex questions about wave propagation and fluid dynamics.
asheg
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi every one,
consider ideal fluid claiming the space all over, and a ball in it which is becoming larger and larger with radius of zero at the begin. Is such a situation possible? Doesn't it in contradiction with ideality (in-compressibility of the fluid). If it's not so, Do places far away from the ball surface sense any change? Is there any wave propagation kind equation for ideal fluids.
Are Div(v)=0 and Curl(v)=0 sufficient for this problem.
(Please give me hints and not the result or solution, since it's on me)
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if the space is infinite, then there should be no problem with incompressibility. On the other hand, if you don't specify incompressibility (this depends on what you consider an "ideal" fluid) then of course a finite volume could accommodate a growing ball.

If the fluid is truly incompressible, then places far away from the ball would instantly "feel" the divergence. If there is some compressibility, then you might have acoustic waves radiating from the ball. If the fluid is stratified, then the disturbance might excite internal gravity waves as well.

Lots of possible results. What are you envisioning?
 
Thanks for your reply.
I think if the incompressible be what you say (changes propagates instantly all over space)
then the velocity distribution would be:
V(R,t) = t^2/R^2
t is time
R is Radius from center

Because the radius of ball at time t would be t and the velocity of fluid there would be 1 same as velocity of ball's surface.

But according to navier stokes it is different:
Div (v) = 0
d/dt(v) + v.Grad(v) = Grad(P)/rho

How one can get the answer from above equation? How to calculate P?
 
The zero divergence (solenoidal) condition is for the fluid parcels themselves. If you postulate a growing "ball" of something in the middle of the fluid, then of course you can't include its volume in your fluid mass conservation. The fluid on all sides of the "ball" continues to satisfy div v = 0.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top