Can an LDR be used in a proximity sensor for coursework in Advancing physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eRazed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ldr Sensor
AI Thread Summary
Using an LDR in a potential divider for a proximity sensor in physics coursework is feasible but presents challenges. The accuracy of distance measurements can be affected by the object's reflective properties and background noise. Conducting the experiment in a dark room may mitigate noise issues, while using an LED as a target can help standardize reflections. However, for more reliable distance measurements, ultrasound sensors are recommended, despite their increased complexity. Ultimately, the choice of method should align with the goals of the experiment.
eRazed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am just about to start my AS level Advancing physics - Sensors coursework.

I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to build a proximity sensor using an LDR in a potential divider.

I would reflect an LED off an object, and move the object at different distances away from the LDR.

I would take readings of the voltage across the potential divider output with the object at these different positions, and plot/analyse graphs of distance against voltage.

Would this be a good idea? Or would I get a series of inaccurate and unreliable results?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two issues here:
- the amount reflected back to the LDR will also depend on the particulars of the object (meaning you can't accurately determine distance for an arbitrary object)
- background noise... there are some simple ways to get around this that I can tell you if you want.

If you are serious about measuring distance I would suggest ultrasound. It is also possible to do this with light but short distances are very difficult due to the high speed of light.
 
could I get rid of the first issue by using an LED to replace the object?

Wouldn't doing the experiment in a dark room fix the noise problem?

If not, how would I do an ultrasound sensor? I'm not really very familiar with them.
 
Last edited:
eRazed said:
could I get rid of the first issue by using an LED to replace the object?

Wouldn't doing the experiment in a dark room fix the noise problem?

If not, how would I do an ultrasound sensor? I'm not really very familiar with them.

To a certain extent an LED object will "fix" the first problem but you'll need to keep the orientation constant. And yes, a dark room will get rid of most of the noise. But this isn't really a realistic situation is it? Depends what your main goal is I suppose.

The idea with the ultrasound is to make a sonar... send pulses through the transducer and measure the time delay. It will be more complicated than your LDR system.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top