Can anyone Debunk this for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsguru
  • Start date Start date
Physicsguru
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
A few days ago I came across this "theory" of an electron, and I want someone to debunk it.

http://rynex29.tripod.com/Newton.htm

I have seen this "orbitsphere" thing before, just thought I would ask if anyone else here has.

Thanks

Guru
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsguru said:
A few days ago I came across this "theory" of an electron, and I want someone to debunk it.

http://rynex29.tripod.com/Newton.htm

I have seen this "orbitsphere" thing before, just thought I would ask if anyone else here has.

Thanks

Guru

What is there to bebunk? The "model" is not falsifiable, meaning it isn't science. It makes NO testable predictions, nor does it even attempt to make any attempt to agree with existeing experimental evidence (you know what "experimental evidence", don't you?)

My question is, why are you giving stuff like this free advertisement on here? Are you short on finding legitimate physics works to read?

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ZapperZ said:
What is there to bebunk? The "model" is not falsifiable, meaning it isn't science. It makes NO testable predictions, nor does it even attempt to make any attempt to agree with existeing experimental evidence (you know what "experimental evidence", don't you?)

My question is, why are you giving stuff like this free advertisement on here? Are you short on finding legitimate physics works to read?

Zz.

I guess I was just wondering if anyone else here had run into this 'orbitsphere' thing before. As for legitimate stuff, i usually read IOP articles.

Regards,

Guru

PS: Here's the one I'm reading now, and oddly i think I've read it before.

http://ej.iop.org/links/q66/Zgawub3T9seUKndYNveb0A/ejp5_2_007.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physicsguru said:
PS: Here's the one I'm reading now, and oddly i think I've read it before.

http://ej.iop.org/links/q66/Zgawub3T9seUKndYNveb0A/ejp5_2_007.pdf

Why would you read something like this when you don't know, and don't even care to know, what the BCS Theory is?

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top