Can EM Diffusion and Scattering by a Rod Be Analyzed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guerom00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffusion Em Rod
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the scattering of electromagnetic fields by a rectangular rod, with participants clarifying terminology and concepts. The original poster initially used "diffusion" but later corrected it to "scattering," referencing established theories like Fresnel and Mie scattering. While the scattering of EM fields by infinite cylinders is documented, there is uncertainty regarding analytical solutions for infinitely long rods. A cited paper suggests complexity in the topic, indicating that no straightforward analytical solution may exist. The conversation highlights the need for further exploration in this area of electromagnetic theory.
guerom00
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
[EM] Scattering by a rod

Hello everyone :)

I'm interrested by the diffusion of an electromagnetic field by a rod with rectangular section i.e. a parallelepiped with one infinite dimension.
Does anyone know if that's already been done ? If it is even possible analytically ?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A rod of what material?
What do you mean by diffusion? That's a term that normally applies to molecular movement - I've never seen it used in relation to EM.
 
Thanks for your answer :)
You might know the Fresnel reflexion coefficients. Well, they describe the diffusion of an EM field by a planar interface.
You might also know the Mie coefficients. Well, they describe the diffusion of an EM field by a sphere of a certain size (for other sizes of the sphere, that will be the Rayleigh coefficients).
I use diffusion here in the sense that you shine a plane wave onto the object and look at what is reflected and transmitted.

I was wondering if the diffusion of an EM field by a rectangular rod has been done. I know that the diffusion of an EM field by an infinite cylinder has been done…

As for the material, any material. It will be described by its dielectric function epsilon(omega) :)

Edit : I understand now: I should use the word scattering instead of diffusion. Sorry :)
 
Last edited:
Fresnel's equations deal with reflection and transmission of light at an interface with a transparent medium. It's an extension of simple wave theory.

Mie scattering is similar to Rayleigh scattering but in relation to slightly larger atmospheric particles.

Both of these are theoretical analyses that seek to explain an observed, natural effect in terms of Physical theory.

I don't know of any observed effects involving infinitely long rods of material.
 
The best I found so far is this paper: Petrov D, Shkuratov Y and Videen G, JQSRT(2010), doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.01.024
Seems rather involved :biggrin: I don't think there is an analytical solution to this problem… Maybe I'm wrong…
 
As the OP stated in post #3, he/she meant to use the word 'scattering' instead of diffusion. Since it's been brought up though, I thought I would just shed some light on electromagnetic diffusion.

If you take the Maxwell equations as quasi-static, i.e. you use both Faraday's law and Ampere's law but neglect the existence of the displacement current, then it is possible to derive diffusion equations for the magnetic field, electric field, and conduction current. These equations are in the exact form of what is commonly called "the diffusion equation;" although, I think there may be some other assumptions you have to make (e.g. spatially homogeneous material parameters) and the quasi-static approximation implies that the wavelengths are much larger than the characteristic system dimensions. In fact, the occurrence of the skin effect, among other things, in AC circuits can be attributed to EM diffusion.

Such discussions are given in Jackson and Smythe, among other places.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top