Can EMF be the same as the current (const)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gustavs1337
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Emf
AI Thread Summary
EMF and current are fundamentally different quantities and cannot be equal, as illustrated by the analogy of comparing oranges to elephants. The discussion emphasizes that even in a circuit without a consumer, the relationship remains unchanged. Repeated assertions reinforce that EMF and current are distinct and cannot equate. The clarification provided has helped to resolve confusion on the topic. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate electrical analysis.
Gustavs1337
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
As the title states, can EMF = I = const ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you come across that equation? emf and current are two different types of quantities. They cannot be equal. It is like saying 2 oranges = 3 elephants
 
Thats what i thought, but what if the circuit has no consumer, can the equatiuon work then ?
 
Nothing matters. The two can never be equal. It still says 2 oranges = 3 elephants.
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
Nothing matters. The two can never be equal. It still says 2 oranges = 3 elephants.
Thank you for your answer. I think this cleared my head.
 

Thread 'How to picture the vector potential?'

Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux
Replies
5
Views
212
I Is electromotive force always equal to potential difference?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Questions about cancelation of induced EMF and minimizing eddy currents
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Why is initial current zero in an RL circuit with an emf?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Deriving expression for resistance in terms of current density
Replies
7
Views
2K
I B-Fields: Deriving Faraday's Law & Why No Work?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Is current proportional to emf
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Understanding magnetic flux change during the falling of magnet
Replies
1
Views
1K
B EMF Radiation detected from TV
Replies
14
Views
6K
What is the maximum current in a superconductor loop?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top