B Can Energy Really Transform into Matter at CERN?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueQuark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Matter
BlueQuark
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Okay, this quite confuses me. "Energy" isn't anything physical. You can't point at energy. It's more of a property, like length. The definition of kinetic energy is ## ke = .5mv^2##.

Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter? An example being CERN, when new particles are created from energy when particles with high energy smash into each other.

Please let me know if I got something wrong, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BlueQuark said:
Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter?
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
 
Dale said:
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
BlueQuark said:
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
That is a large part of what the standard model explains. I don't know it well enough to explain it, but I would recommend asking that question in the QM forum. Be warned, there probably is not a B level answer.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Back
Top