Can Entropy Be Reduced in a Spontaneous Thermodynamic Process?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jornrune
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamic scenario involving a small chamber of H2O gas and an infinitely large reservoir of H2O gas. When the valve is opened, the gases mix until they reach equilibrium at 1 bar, with the properties expected to be 1.0 Bar, 7.9 kJ/(kg*K), 220C, and 2900 kJ/kg. The participant questions whether this process, which appears to lower entropy, aligns with the second law of thermodynamics. They emphasize that since the pressure is dictated by the infinite source, there seems to be no alternative outcomes, leading to a potential contradiction in thermodynamic principles. The inquiry seeks clarity on whether enthalpy or temperature changes could explain the observed results.
jornrune
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! I have a practical problem that causes me to wonder. It seems like I have to choose from gaining energy from nothing, or to get a reduction in entropy from a spontaneous process.

Imagine a small enclosed chamber filled with dry H2O gas. The properties are:
0.5 Bar
8.0 kJ/(kg*K)
200C
2850kJ/kg

An infinitely large reservoir of H2O gas has the following properties:
1.0 Bar
8.0kJ/(kg*K)
240C
2950kJ/kg

Here is a reference chart:
http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam tables p-h diagram (large).png

A valve between the large reservoir and the small chamber is opened and the two gasses are mixed until they reach equilibrium inside the chamber and the pressure is stabilized at 1 bar. Am I correct in assuming that no work has been done and that the properties will be as follows?:
1.0 Bar
7.9kJ/(kg*K)
220C
2900kJ/kg

This seems to be correct as far as temperature and pressure goes. It also seems to add up with the enthalpy as the process is thought to be adiabatic. However, the entropy is lowered, and the process seems to be a so called spontaneous process. The question is if this goes along with the second law of thermodynamics. (It can be read here if you need it refreshed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics)

Also, I see no room for different results. The pressure is given by the infinite source. This means we can not leave the 1 bar line. There is no way we can get any condensation, so we have the following options:
1: The entropy is actually reduced
2: Enthalpy is lost or gained, and so is temperature

...or am I overlooking something here?

Thanks for any response!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you open up the valve and wait for equilibrium, the gas inside your small chamber will be identical to the one in the large reservoir.
 
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top