Can Falling From a Chair and a Building Cause Different Levels of Injury?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phys_Boi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Homework
Click For Summary
Falling from a chair typically results in minimal injury due to low deceleration, while falling from a building leads to fatal outcomes due to significantly higher deceleration upon impact. The key factor in injury severity is the force experienced during deceleration, which increases with the fall's velocity. Kinetic energy plays a crucial role, as greater energy must be dissipated upon impact, leading to more severe injuries. Factors like ground softness and body deformation also influence the extent of injury but are less predictable. Understanding these principles clarifies why different fall heights result in varying injury levels.
Phys_Boi
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
If you fall off of a chair you don't get hurt, however, if you fall off of a building you die. How is this possible if you are experiencing the same force..
F=mg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the old joke goes, it is not falling down that hurts, it when you stop falling!

The force that will hurt you is the one due to the deceleration, (negative acceleration) when you suddenly stop. The faster you were going, the greater the deceleration.
 
DrClaude said:
As the old joke goes, it is not falling down that hurts, it when you stop falling!

The force that will hurt you is the one due to the deceleration, (negative acceleration) when you suddenly stop. The faster you were going, the greater the deceleration.
Okay! So how do you know the time from the initial velocity and 0 velocity?
 
Phys_Boi said:
Okay! So how do you know the time from the initial velocity and 0 velocity?
There is no easy way to calculate that. It depends on so many things, like the softness of the ground and how much deformation you can sustain before breaking. But generally speaking, you can consider that the stopping time is about the same in all cases, and therefore that the higher the velocity, the stronger the force.

It is probably more relevant to consider it from the point of view of kinetic energy rather than force. The more kinetic energy you have, the more will have get dissipated quickly when you hit the ground, so the more of that energy will go into squashing you and breaking your bones.
 
Okay! Thanks!
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K