B Can Geometric Progressions Starting from One Sum to a Perfect Square?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Medtner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a geometric progression starting from one that sums to a perfect square. An example provided is 1 + 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 = 121, which equals 11^2. Participants suggest using spreadsheets to explore more combinations, noting there are two three-digit examples. Additionally, examining the differences between consecutive squares may offer insights into potential solutions. The conversation highlights the challenge of identifying real-life examples of such geometric progressions.
Medtner
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
"Write out a series of three or more different whole numbers in geometric progression, starting from one, so that the numbers should add up to a square. So like, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 = 63 (one short of a square)"(can't find an actual real life example)

I can't seem to find an answer for this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just use a spreadsheet to try some more, there are two three-digit examples.
 
1+3+9+27+81=121=11^2
 
Medtner said:
"Write out a series of three or more different whole numbers in geometric progression, starting from one, so that the numbers should add up to a square. So like, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 = 63 (one short of a square)"(can't find an actual real life example)

I can't seem to find an answer for this?
Try considering the sequence of squares, 0, 1, 4, 9, ..., and take the difference between subsequent squares. That will help you find the answer.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top