Can I be a good theorist without a degree in math?

In summary, it is possible to be a good theorist without a formal degree in math, as theoretical work often relies on logical reasoning, creativity, and a deep understanding of concepts rather than solely on advanced mathematical skills. Many successful theorists have diverse educational backgrounds and emphasize the importance of self-study, collaboration, and practical experience in developing theoretical insights.
  • #1
garra
3
0
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know what a "math physics degree" is, but most theoretical physicists have degrees in physics.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
  • #3
garra said:
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?
How hard do you think it would be to Google something like "who are the current leaders in theoretical physics" and then look up whether or not they have a degree in math? I did that and the result is easily obtained and definitive.

If you are going to go into science, you should learn how to do research.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, robphy, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #4
phinds said:
How hard do you think it would be to Google something like "who are the current leaders in theoretical physics" and then look up whether or not they have a degree in math? I
While I agree with your point, here is one of thise cases where Google bobbles it. About a third of "the current leaders in theoretical physics" are dead,
 
  • Haha
Likes fresh_42 and vanhees71
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't know what a "math physics degree" is, but most theoretical physicists have degrees in physics.
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
 
  • #6
Don't get too distracted by seeking credentials (e.g., this degree, that degree, this certification, that certification). Figure out what you want to do, see what you need to know to do it, and start learning.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy, vanhees71, FactChecker and 4 others
  • #7
garra said:
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
Which totally avoids any response to my statement.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #8
Vanadium 50 said:
While I agree with your point, here is one of thise cases where Google bobbles it. About a third of "the current leaders in theoretical physics" are dead,
Yeah, but before they died, they didn't have math degrees :oldlaugh:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and vanhees71
  • #9
phinds said:
Yeah, but before they died, they didn't have math degrees
Nor after, for that matter.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, vanhees71, FactChecker and 2 others
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Nor after, for that matter.
Based on a quick Google search, many universities have procedures for awarding posthumous degrees. 🤔
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, FactChecker and Hornbein
  • #11
Why not? I know of a few faculty awarded tenure after brain death.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes fresh_42, phinds and vanhees71
  • #12
garra said:
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
Having a formal double major or a major/minor in Physics and Math is less important than the actual math courses you've taken.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and garra
  • #13
garra said:
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?

I think you mean Roger Penrose,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose ,
who has degrees in mathematics
and made substantial contributions in various fields involving mathematics, including general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes garra
  • #14
robphy said:
I think you mean Roger Penrose,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose ,
who has degrees in mathematics
and made substantial contributions in various fields involving mathematics, including general relativity.
Yes. Im so embarrassed
 
  • #15
Haborix said:
Don't get too distracted by seeking credentials (e.g., this degree, that degree, this certification, that certification). Figure out what you want to do, see what you need to know to do it, and start learning.

Here are two theorists with non-traditional degree paths. (There are likely many others.)
Of course, these two are exceptional.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Witten
Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in history and minor in linguistics from Brandeis University in 1971
PhD in physics from Princeton in 1976

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_Dyson
https://www.iop.org/physics-community/obituaries/freeman-dyson
https://www.ias.edu/sns/dyson
BA degree in mathematics from Cambridge in 1945
[no PhD]
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn and Demystifier
  • #16
Paul Dirac:
- electrical engineering degree 1921
- mathematics degree 1923
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn
  • #17
It seems that it would be easier to list the physicists with a physics degree.
 
  • #19
Actually, during my PhD I had a collegue who switched after his bachelor in Engineering to a one year master in theoretical physics and wrote a highly technical PhD thesis on a topic related to string theory.

Also, I ended up being an excellent theorist without a math degree 😜
 
  • #20
haushofer said:
Also, I ended up being an excellent theorist without a math degree 😜
Define ”excellent”, ”theorist”, and ”math degree” 🤣
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #21
Well, not to boast, but I'm theoretically excellent at maths, to a degree, myself.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and berkeman
  • #22
Examples from 50+ years ago are not so relevant for the times of today. The time between today and when Dyson got his PhD is about the same as the time between when Dyson got his PhD and Maxwell.

As for Ed Witten, many people come to PF thinking they are the next Ed Witten. Not so many actually are.
 
  • Like
Likes gwnorth
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
The time between today and when Dyson got his PhD
Dyson never got a PhD.
 
  • #25
Orodruin said:
Define ”excellent”, ”theorist”, and ”math degree” 🤣
I'll probably end up being disappointed, so let me keep my illusions 😎
 

FAQ: Can I be a good theorist without a degree in math?

Can I be a good theorist without a degree in math?

Yes, it is possible to be a good theorist without a formal degree in math. Many successful theorists have backgrounds in physics, computer science, or other related fields. The key is to develop a strong understanding of mathematical concepts and techniques relevant to your area of interest.

What alternative paths can I take to become proficient in mathematics for theoretical work?

There are several alternative paths you can take to become proficient in mathematics. Self-study through textbooks, online courses, and educational platforms like Khan Academy, Coursera, or edX can be highly effective. Additionally, attending workshops, seminars, and collaborating with mathematicians can provide valuable insights and guidance.

How important is formal education in mathematics for a career in theoretical research?

While formal education in mathematics can provide a structured and comprehensive foundation, it is not the only path to success in theoretical research. Practical experience, problem-solving skills, and the ability to think critically and creatively are equally important. Many theorists have made significant contributions through self-directed learning and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Can I collaborate with mathematicians to compensate for my lack of a math degree?

Absolutely. Collaboration with mathematicians can be a valuable way to compensate for a lack of formal education in math. By working with experts, you can gain insights, learn new techniques, and develop a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts. Collaborative projects can also lead to innovative and impactful research outcomes.

What skills should I focus on to be a successful theorist without a math degree?

To be a successful theorist without a math degree, focus on developing strong analytical and problem-solving skills. Learn to think abstractly and conceptually, and become proficient in the mathematical tools and techniques relevant to your field. Additionally, improve your ability to communicate complex ideas clearly and collaborate effectively with others.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
609
Replies
6
Views
467
Replies
4
Views
168
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top