Can Inertia Affect the Shape of Electron Clouds in Accelerating Ions?

ravisastry
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all,


correct my understanding... Inertia should be applicable at sub atomic level as well. right ?
Consider this scenario, a positively charged helium ion is accelerating. the electron cloud in this case should be somewhat oval or elliptical right ? this would be because, the electric charge is uneven in the ion and the ion is accelerating... this would cause the electron cloud to form an oval shape..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably you're talking about a singly charged Helium ion, in which the nucleus has charge +2, one electron is missing and the remaining one is in the ground state.

You don't say how the ion is being accelerated, and it makes a difference. For example if it's falling in a gravitational field, the equivalence principle tells us the ion suffers no distortion at all. More likely since it's charged, you're accelerating it with an electric field. The effect that a uniform external field has on an atom is known as the Stark effect. Qualitatively what happens is that the atom becomes polarized - that is it develops an electric dipole moment. The positively charged nucleus is pulled in one direction while the negatively charged electron is pulled in the other. Rather than the acceleration, I'm talking about the force, but it's all the same.

I'm afraid your intuition is incorrect, the electron's orbital would not become football-shaped, which would imply a quadrupole moment. Rather the atom develops a dipole moment.
 
Thanks Bill for the explanation... you mentioned about atom being polarized in uniform electric field (atom is still accelerating) and hence takes elongated shape rather than a circle.. what i was thinking is..the inertia might also have some effect in distorting the shape ?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Back
Top