Can Matter Really Have Negative Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of negative energy in relation to gravitational potential energy (GPE) and mass. It highlights that the definition of energy, including negative energy, is often arbitrary and depends on the chosen reference point, such as setting gravitational potential energy to zero at an infinite distance. The conversation also emphasizes that while gravitational potential energy can be negative, it does not imply that mass can have negative energy. In relativity, the zero point of energy is absolute, and the Positive Energy Theorem asserts that anything with positive mass must have positive energy. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the nuances of energy in physics.
nouveau_riche
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
can a matter have negative energy?
or more appropriately what makes some energy as negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just depends on what your reference point is. For example, as it is convention to have gravitational potential energy at an infinite distance away to be 0 joules, our calculations show GPE to be negative.
 
Bloodthunder said:
It just depends on what your reference point is. For example, as it is convention to have gravitational potential energy at an infinite distance away to be 0 joules, our calculations show GPE to be negative.

isn't that anything that has positive mass have positive energy?
i am not certain on that
 
nouveau_riche said:
isn't that anything that has positive mass have positive energy?
i am not certain on that

I think you need to step back and learn a bit more on classical mechanics.

One can easily see that, for example, in attractive energies (example: gravitational potential), it is DEFINED that zero is at infinity, and that the gravitational potential well is defined as being negative!

The same can be said about the potential that an electron has in an atom (look at the potential energy term in the Schrodinger equation).

So you need to learn a bit more of what we mean by negative energy, and why it is rather arbitrary in some sense.

Zz.
 
isn't that anything that has positive mass have positive energy?
i am not certain on that
nouveau_riche, You are absolutely correct, and this is not a trivial issue, as several responses have implied. It's true that in Newtonian physics the zero point of energy is arbitrary. You can define it to be the energy that a particle has as infinity, or you can define it to be the energy it has at the Earth's surface, as you like. But in relativity this is not the case. In relativity the zero point of energy is absolute. A particle's gravitational potential energy is negative but can never exceed its rest mass, and so the sum is always positive.

The statement you made, "anything that has positive mass must have positive energy" is known as the Positive Energy Theorem or Positive Mass Conjecture, and has been proved under rather general assumptions. See the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_energy_theorem, or google Positive Energy Theorem and you will find many references to it.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Back
Top