Can Multivariable Interpolation Relate Three Sets of Data Points?

AI Thread Summary
Multivariable interpolation can establish a relationship between three sets of data points (x, y, z) by constructing a polynomial function that fits the given points. A polynomial of degree three can be derived from the data, allowing for the calculation of z values based on x and y inputs. While the method guarantees interpolation at the specified points, the behavior of the function between these points may be unpredictable. Some users suggest exploring integral transforms in multi-dimensional spaces as an alternative approach. Overall, it is possible to create a function that meets the requirements, and there are methods available that do not require extensive mathematical knowledge.
KV-1
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I am wondering if it is possible to establish a relationship between three sets of points (x,y,z) by interpolating.

Basically i need a function that takes x and y and gives me a z that matches the following points:


130 472 5
130 590 6
130 738 7.5
130 944 10
155 563 5
155 704 6
155 880 7.5
155 1126 10
180 654 5
180 817 6
180 1022 7.5
180 1308 10
205 745 5
205 931 6
205 1163 7.5
205 1489 10
240 872 5
240 1472 8

I want the middle column to be yielded by the equation when the outer columns are fed into it.. ex (first point): f(130,5) = 472

is this possible? if so, are there any calculators that you recommend or methods that don't require very complex math? (I only know calculus).

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, let's say you had a function that is just from R to R. That is, it takes in one variable and spits out a number. If you had n points at which you knew the value of the function, then you can construct an n-1 degree polynomial that will pass through each of those points, and this polynomial is unique. Now, you have what looks to be 4 x values and 4 y values. Now, you should be able to construct a polynomial in the two variables x,y that is of degree 3. That is, it has the form: p(x,y) = a_{3,3}x^3y^3 + \cdots + a_{3,0}x^3 + a_{2,3}x^2y^3 + \cdots a_{2,0}x^2 + \cdots a_{0,3}y^3 + \cdots a_{0,0}, where you can find the values of the coeficitnts a_{i,j} by solving a system of 16 equations (using the 16 data points you have.) Now, I can show you how to set this up, but I am not sure how well something like this will interpolate. I know that it will interpolate exactly to each of you data points, but I don't know enough theory to be able to predict how it will behave in between those points.
 
Oh thanks!

Not sure though, I think I found some equations that give me the desired points without having to interpolate though...

It helps to know how this can be done though!
 
Hey KV-1 and welcome to the forums.

Are you aware of integral transforms, especially on multi-dimensional spaces?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top