Can Perpendicular Waves Interfere When Overlapping?

AI Thread Summary
When two waves overlap perpendicularly in a linear system, their amplitudes can be summed without interference, resulting in a resultant wave whose characteristics depend on their phase difference. In a linear context, the principle of superposition applies, meaning the displacement at any point is the vector sum of the individual waves. If the waves are not at right angles, their interaction can lead to constructive or destructive interference based on their phase differences. However, destructive interference does not mean the waves will diminish over time; their amplitudes remain constant as long as the sources continue to emit consistently. Ultimately, the resultant disturbance from perpendicular waves will still be influenced by their phase relationship, producing various oscillation patterns.
scijeebus
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
If you have two waves overlapping each other which are perfectly perpendicular to each other, will there be any interference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the system is linear, you can always add the individual waves, independent of the angle and the amplitude of the waves, and independent of the number of different waves. The amplitude at a specific point+time is the sum of the amplitudes of the individual waves.

If the system is nonlinear, the waves might influence each other.
 
mfb said:
If the system is linear, you can always add the individual waves, independent of the angle and the amplitude of the waves, and independent of the number of different waves. The amplitude at a specific point+time is the sum of the amplitudes of the individual waves.

If the system is nonlinear, the waves might influence each other.

If I wave is oscillating in a specific direction x, and is not perpendicular to a different wave doing in direction y in 3-dimensional space (but let's say there's no friction that would cause the waves to lose energy over time), would there be destructive interference that would eventually cause the waves to die down?
 
Everything is governed by the principle of superposition: at any point in the path of the waves, and at any time, the displacement is the vector sum of the displacements that each wave would give if it were the only wave. [This applies to linear systems, and most systems are linear unless the amplitude is very high.]

If the displacements of the individual waves are not at right angles, then their vector sum will depend on their phase difference, which will vary from one point to another, according to the difference in path length from the two sources (and the phases of the sources themselves). So there could be constructive or destructive interference, or something in between.

Destructive interference doesn't imply a dying down of waves over time. The amplitudes at each point won't change with time, as long as the sources go on emitting in the same way (same amplitudes and no discontinuities in their oscillations). Remember that if there is destructive interference at some points, there will be constuctive at others.
 
Philip Wood said:
If the displacements of the individual waves are not at right angles, then their vector sum will depend on their phase difference, which will vary from one point to another, according to the difference in path length from the two sources (and the phases of the sources themselves). So there could be constructive or destructive interference, or something in between.

So are you implying if they are perpendicular their vector some will not be the phase difference and it would be a difference of something else or that they would not be summed?
 
If they are perpendicular, there won't be constructive or destructive interference, but the resultant disturbance will still depend on the phase difference!

For example, if the component waves are each of amplitude A, and there is zero phase difference, the resultant disturbance will be in an oscillation in a straight line in a direction 'midway between' that of the component oscillations, and of amplitude \sqrt{2} A. This is a simple consequence of the principle of superposition.

But if the component waves are out of phase by \tfrac{\pi}{2}, that is a quarter of a cycle, the particle in the medium will describe a circular path of radius A. Again, this follows from the principle of superposition.

Other phase differences will give elliptical paths.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Back
Top