Can Polynomials in Two Variables Be Expressed in Different Forms?

AI Thread Summary
Polynomials in two variables can be expressed in different forms, similar to polynomials in one variable. A quadratic polynomial like Q(x,y) can represent various geometric figures such as circles, ellipses, hyperbolas, or parabolas when plotted on the X-Y plane. To determine the specific form, one can calculate the discriminant and rotate the coordinate system to eliminate cross terms, leading to a standard form for the geometric figure. However, factorization of the polynomial Q(x,y) into a product of linear factors is complex and does not have a general solution due to the nature of the resulting equations in the (p,q,r) space. The discussion highlights the challenges in finding a consistent intersection of these equations, suggesting that while alternative forms exist, factorization remains intricate.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
If a polynomial of 1 variable, for example: P(x) = ax²+bx+c, can be written as P(x) = a(x-x1)(x-x2), so a polynomial of 2 variables like: Q(x,y) = ax²+bxy+cy²+dx+ey+f can be written of another form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have a quadratic in two variables; if you plot it on the X-Y plane it will be a circle, ellipse, hyperbola, parabola, or a pair of lines. You can discover which by writing it in standard form and then calculating the discriminant:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/QuadraticCurveDiscriminant.html

Once you know the form you can rotate the coordinate system so that the cross terms disappear; use the vanishing of the cross term coefficient as the constraint.

Then put it into "standard form" for the particular geometric figure.

For a circle it will be (u-h)^2/r^2 + (v-g)^2/r^2 = 1, and similar for the other cases.
 
Actually, I'm asking if is possible to factorize the polynomial Q(x,y)!?
 
<br /> (px + qy + r)(sx + ty + u) = psx^2 + (pt + qs)xy + qty^2 + (pu + rs)x + (qu + rt)y + ru<br />

That gives you six equations in six unknowns.

There is no general solution, because you can pretty quickly eliminate s = a/p, t = c/q and u = f/r to end up with <br /> cp^2 + aq^2 = bpq \\<br /> fp^2 + ar^2 = dpr \\<br /> fq^2 + cr^2 = eqr. These are cylinders in (p,q,r) space whose cross-sections are conic sections in the (p,q), (p,r) and (q,r) planes respectively. There is no reason why these should all intersect (it's pretty easy to arrange three such cylinders of circular cross-section so that they don't intersect), and if they do all intersect they may do so at multiple points.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
<br /> (px + qy + r)(sx + ty + u) = psx^2 + (pt + qs)xy + qty^2 + (pu + rs)x + (qu + rt)y + ru<br />

That gives you six equations in six unknowns.

There is no general solution, because you can pretty quickly eliminate s = a/p, t = c/q and u = f/r to end up with <br /> cp^2 + aq^2 = bpq \\<br /> fp^2 + ar^2 = dpr \\<br /> fq^2 + cr^2 = eqr. These are cylinders in (p,q,r) space whose cross-sections are conic sections in the (p,q), (p,r) and (q,r) planes respectively. There is no reason why these should all intersect (it's pretty easy to arrange three such cylinders of circular cross-section so that they don't intersect), and if they do all intersect they may do so at multiple points.

Nice!

I thought in something like this:
##Q(x,y) = A(x-a)(x-b) + B(x-c)(y-d) + C(y-e)(y-f)##

Do you have more ideias??
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top