B Can Quantum Occur on Manifolds Beyond Spacetime?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter jlcd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds Quantum
jlcd
Messages
274
Reaction score
7
Does the words "Quantum Manifolds" make any sense?

Can quantum occurs on a manifold?

Or do you automatically equate manifolds to lorentzian manifold and it becomes a problem of quantum gravity?

Or can there be manifolds not related to spacetime.. so can quantum on manifold make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is 'Quantum'?
I know what manifolds are: mathematical structures used to describe several physical models. Therefore manifolds appear not only in spacetime models. If you like you could even regard every vector space as a manifold.
So what do you mean by 'Quantum'?
At its best it is 'something discrete' and not really appropriate as a precisely defined term outside of QFT, QCD or alike. Even quantum gravity is IMO more a popular punchline to describe GUTs than a physically term.
Therefore we are left with discrete manifolds, i.e. a discrete topology which is rather boring. I don't know whether it is used in physical models. However, there are lattices in QFT. I have no idea whether manifolds are an appropriate concept to deal with them, but I have my doubts.
 
Does the words "higher dimensional manifolds" make sense? Since quantum has non-local correlations beyond Lorentizian spacetime.. is it not incorrect to say quantum waves use higher dimensional manifolds?
 
jlcd said:
Does the words "higher dimensional manifolds" make sense?
A manifold can have a dimension, so "higher dimensional manifolds" might make sense when it is clear what we're comparing when we say that the dimensionality of one manifold is higher than that of another.
Since quantum has non-local correlations beyond Lorentizian spacetime.. is it not incorrect to say quantum waves use higher dimensional manifolds?
Neither correct nor incorrect, as this is just meaningless babble.

This thread is closed.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top