Can RPT Machines Be Upgraded with Low-Cost Laser Technology for 3D Printing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter makethings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
AI Thread Summary
RPT machines like RepRap and Fab@Home may be adaptable for laser-based stereolithography, but challenges exist regarding the appropriate laser wattage needed to cure photopolymer effectively. The discussion highlights concerns about the laser's straight-line curing method, which could complicate the process unless multiple low-power lasers are used to intersect and trigger curing. Most existing systems rely on a combination of UV light and air for curing, necessitating a specific approach to layer formation. Additionally, there is uncertainty about the materials used in home 3D printers, particularly whether they can be cured with laser technology. Research into suitable UV-activated photopolymers and cost-effective laser options is essential for developing a low-cost 3D printing solution.
makethings
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hi. I've been looking at RPT projects like reprap and fab@home whose aim is to provide a low cost solution to rapid prototyping. I was wondering if anyone with RPT experience could tell me if those machines could be outfitted with a laser (like what you might find in your typical home/office laser printer) and use a stereolithography to perform the printing.

I guess some things I want to find out are, like what wattage laser is needed to cure a vat of photopolymer to form a solid object. And is the cost reasonable to make a low cost 3d printer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The problem with a laser is that it goes in a straight line through the material and so would cure the full depth. You could imagine having a number of laser were the power for each was low so as to only trigger the cure where several beams intersected but the chemistry might be tricky.
I think most system rely on the cure only working with a comination of light (UV?) and air, so that the printer draws on the flat surface making an outline of that contour level which cures and then the model sinks slightly to give a new fresh surface.
 
I would have to do some background research on the "home versions." The SLA machines I am familiar with are nowhere near a home DIY set up. Don't they use some kind of powder with a binder, or am I dating myself with that?

Do you know off the top of your head what the media is that the home machines use? Is it even curable with a laser?
 
These personal fabber machines use fused deposition modelling as the technique. They use a polymorph stubstance as the material.

For curable laser technology, it would have to be some kind of UV activated liquid photopolymer, however, what kind of laser with the most minimal power (cheap cost) could do the job?
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top