I have time on my hands today and I read your post earlier. I am still not sure what it is you want, no reply as yet so I will dip in and guess.happyhacker said:I am writing a (hard!) Sci-Fi novel and am considering capturing some of my research in references. I would welcome any suggestions as to online resources that pull together across all science (+ physics) disciplines the sort of subject materials I would likely need. Idea is to focus somehow when I have a particular idea to follow. As an example vox.com may be a suitable news source.
I am writing a sci-fi plot also, set in 1909 on an alien planet called the Xanadu Wastelands with a 1930s equivalent level of technology. An asteroid struck the planet on 1/16/1909, 148 km from New Spork City. I plan on using sources from science research papers. You can find articles without a paywall quite easily using some tricks or a journal downloader (not gonna say the name of the website). Given my asteroid diameter of 164.4 m, and a collision speed of 17 km/s, I calculated the tsunami height to be 5-8 meters using a few articles. That would probably flood parts of the coastal city of New Spork.happyhacker said:I am writing a (hard!) Sci-Fi novel and am considering capturing some of my research in references. I would welcome any suggestions as to online resources that pull together across all science (+ physics) disciplines the sort of subject materials I would likely need. Idea is to focus somehow when I have a particular idea to follow. As an example vox.com may be a suitable news source.
Incorporating real science into sci-fi narratives can enhance plausibility by grounding fantastical elements in established scientific principles. This not only makes the story more relatable but also invites readers to engage more deeply with the themes and concepts presented. When writers use accurate scientific concepts, it can spark curiosity and encourage readers to explore the science behind the fiction.
Many sci-fi works successfully integrate real science, such as "The Martian" by Andy Weir, which is grounded in accurate physics and botany, or "Contact" by Carl Sagan, which incorporates astrophysics and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. These examples show how scientific accuracy can enhance storytelling by creating a believable and immersive world.
Yes, there are risks. Writers may inadvertently misrepresent scientific concepts, leading to misinformation or confusion among readers. Additionally, overly technical explanations can alienate audiences who may not have a background in science. Striking a balance between scientific accuracy and engaging storytelling is crucial to avoid these pitfalls.
Writers can ensure accuracy by conducting thorough research, consulting experts in relevant scientific fields, and staying updated with current scientific discoveries. Engaging with scientific literature, attending lectures, and participating in discussions with scientists can also provide valuable insights that enhance the authenticity of their narratives.
While some may argue that adhering to real science can constrain creativity, it can also serve as a springboard for imaginative ideas. Writers can explore the implications of scientific concepts, envision future technologies, or speculate on the consequences of scientific advancements. By using real science as a foundation, writers can create innovative and thought-provoking scenarios that challenge readers' perceptions and inspire new ideas.