Can Someone Help with Gaussian Beams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green Lantern
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Gaussian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding Gaussian beams, specifically focusing on a He-Ne laser with a spot size of 5.00 microns. Participants seek to determine the beam waist (w(0)), the fraction of laser intensity within the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM), and the angle of beam spread over distances. Clarifications are made regarding the use of the wavelength of 633 nm and the definition of w(z) as a measure of beam width. The conversation highlights the need for precise definitions and equations related to laser intensity profiles for accurate calculations.
Green Lantern
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. A laser scientist tells you that her He-Ne laser can be focused to a spot size of 5.00 microns. When pressed for details, she tells you that she got this number by measuring the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of the intensity profile of the laser waist.

a) What is w(0) for this laser?

b) What fraction of the laser intensity is contained within the FHWM?

c) At what (full) angle will the beam spread over large distances, if one continues to measure the width of the laser beam to be the FHWM of the intensity?

Homework Equations



254ca016952b78f3597feda00adbb4f6.png


e58a707d1ccf4ed6cefac660633038a8.png


[PLAIN]http://www.zemax.com/kb/content_images/fwhm/Equation1.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/GaussianBeamWaist.svg/350px-GaussianBeamWaist.svg.png[/URL]

From previous experience in a laboratory I know that the wavelength of a He-Ne laser is about 633 nm. I don't know if I can assume that for the purposes of this question. I'm using Laser Electronics 3E by Joseph Verdeyen and the book doesn't do a good job of explaining full width half maximum intensity. There's also no sample problems in the book or examples so I really can't tell if I'm doing it right. I don't know either z or z(R), although I can express z(R) in terms of w(0), but I don't know that quantity either. The equation for intensity above didn't come from my book. At least I didn't see it there. Am I supposed to use the 0.5 microns as w(z) for the intensity equation here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm just going to bump this topic.
 
What does w(z) represent? I assume it's some sort of measure of the width of the beam, but how is it defined exactly?
 
The book here gives w(z) as the spot size. There is a minimum spot size at a certain point along the z-axis defined as z=0.
 
vela said:
What does w(z) represent? I assume it's some sort of measure of the width of the beam, but how is it defined exactly?
It's defined by this equation given in the OP:

[PLAIN]http://www.zemax.com/kb/content_images/fwhm/Equation1.jpg[/INDENT]

where I0 is the intensity at r=0. I0 and w are both functions of z. At the beam's focus, w takes on it's minimum value, denoted by w0.

Green Lantern, if you set I=I0/2 in that equation, you can determine what r is at the half-maximum points.

Green Lantern said:
From previous experience in a laboratory I know that the wavelength of a He-Ne laser is about 633 nm. I don't know if I can assume that for the purposes of this question.
Yes, that is a reasonably valid assumption.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top