Can Statically or Magnetically Charged Materials Absorb Free Electrons from Air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jdo300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Ions
Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hello, I am wondering if it is possible to absorb free electrons/ions in the air using a statically charged material, or even a magnetically charged material. I've heard that putting a large antenna up high will create a charge potential but what about ripping energy out of ambient air particles? Is this possible, and if so, are there any materials that could do this naturally?

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's an antistatic "gun" that was used to "shoot" at records to eliminate any excess charge buildup. It worked by squeezing a trigger connected to a mechanism that transferred this mechanical energy to a quartz crystal. There is an effect in crystals called the peizo-electric effect which is the response of the crystal to produce a voltage under mechanical stress.
 
Hmmmm this piezo-electric effect sounds interesting. You say it works just by applying pressure to a quartz crystal?? If that is the case, why don't they juat take a big crystal and set it under a heavy weight to generate constant power? :confused:

Thanks,
Jason O
 
The crystal only releases electricity while pressure is changing. It would be like trying to put a heavy weight on top of a bellows, and use the air that comes out of the bellows to power generator. As soon as the weight has squashed the bellows down as far as it is going to, energy ceases to be released.
 
What LURCH said. One thing I have come to realize is that, whenever something seems to supply an infinite source of energy, I just don't understand it well enough.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top