Can the direction of friction force be opposite to the direction of motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrk613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction General
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on modifying the formula F=ma to incorporate static or kinetic friction coefficients. The friction force opposes the motion of the contact point of an object, with its magnitude calculated as F = mu * N, where mu is the coefficient of friction and N is the normal force. In specific cases, such as a rolling wheel, the direction of the friction force can align with the direction of motion. This highlights that friction acts on the contact point rather than the object as a whole. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate force analysis in physics.
jrk613
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how to modify F=ma and put in either static or kinetic friction coefficient. I assume it's something like F-(friction coef) but I'm just not sure, any ideas or websites someone can direct me to? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jrk613 said:
I was wondering how to modify F=ma and put in either static or kinetic friction coefficient. I assume it's something like F-(friction coef) but I'm just not sure, any ideas or websites someone can direct me to? thanks

When you draw the free body diagram, you put in a friction force vector as one of the force vectors acting on the object. The direction of the friction force vector is to oppose motion of the object (whether static or kinetic friction), and the magnitude is generally F = mu * N, where mu is the coefficient of friction, and N is the normal force between the object and whatever it is rubbing on. N is often just the weight of the object, for example.
 
berkeman said:
The direction of the friction force vector is to oppose motion of the object (whether static or kinetic friction)
Not the object as a whole. Only the motion of the contact point. For the FBD of a rolling wheel or an entire car for example, friction can turn out to be in the direction of motion.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K