B Can the output forces for F3 and F4 be the same as F2 in hydraulic lifting?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating output forces F3 and F4 in a hydraulic lifting system, where input force F1 and area A1 are consistent across three cases. According to Pascal's principle, output force F2 is determined by the formula F2 = A2/A1 x F1. It is noted that forces acting on the top surfaces of areas A2 in cases 2 and 3 do not contribute to movement, thus producing no mechanical work. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering only the "moving areas" for calculating net forces. The thread was ultimately locked and suggested for relocation to a more appropriate forum for homework help.
ucody0911
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
User has been reminded to post schoolwork problems in the Homework Help forums and to always show their Attempt at the Solution
Hello All,
pls see picture , input force F1 and area A1 and second area A2 are all same for 3 cases
for the 1st case , output force F2 should be F2=A2/A1 x F1 , by pascal's principle ,
what about output forces of F3 and F4 ? can be same as F2 ? how i calculate them ?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • hyd lift.jpg
    hyd lift.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 152
Physics news on Phys.org
Hydraulic pressure applies on all the inner surfaces, upper, base and the sides of A2. Some forces by pressure cancel because they have opposite directions and you would get the net results.
 
Last edited:
The "moving areas" are the only ones to be considered.
The force on the top surfaces A2 of cases 2 and 3 produces no movement; therefore, no mechanical work.
 
Lnewqban said:
The "moving areas" are the only ones to be considered.
The force on the top surfaces A2 of cases 2 and 3 produces no movement; therefore, no mechanical work.
Presumably the red open outline represents a free-to-move piston. Why wouldn't the piston move?
 
Last edited:
ucody0911 said:
Hello All,
pls see picture , input force F1 and area A1 and second area A2 are all same for 3 cases
for the 1st case , output force F2 should be F2=A2/A1 x F1 , by pascal's principle ,
what about output forces of F3 and F4 ? can be same as F2 ? how i calculate them ?

thanks

Please re-post this in the Homework Help, Introductory Physics forum and use the hints you have been given here to show your work toward a solution. This misplaced schoolwork thread is now locked.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top