Can the Sigma Be Removed from the Normalization Equation for a Wavefunction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zahra95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing a wavefunction and the role of the sigma in the normalization equation. Participants emphasize that sigma cannot be ignored and suggest finding an expression for the norm of the wavefunction. They propose testing with a simpler sum to understand the normalization process better. Additionally, there is a recommendation to research "sums of reciprocal powers" for further insight. The conversation highlights the complexity of normalization in quantum mechanics and the importance of careful mathematical treatment.
zahra95
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the wavefunction
upload_2016-1-30_13-3-48.png


where <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5.png
. I want to normalize it and find constant normalization A. A is real number.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that for normalizing the wave function

upload_2016-1-30_13-6-58.png

but what happen for sigma? can I remove it from equation?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-9.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-9.png
    278 bytes · Views: 432
  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-17.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-17.png
    220 bytes · Views: 408
  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-59.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-59.png
    278 bytes · Views: 424
  • upload_2016-1-30_13-2-42.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-2-42.png
    687 bytes · Views: 465
  • upload_2016-1-30_13-4-26.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-4-26.png
    808 bytes · Views: 460
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just ignore the sigma! First, can you find an expression for ##||\phi||^2##?
 
I think the equation is :
upload_2016-1-30_13-49-39.png
because <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34-png.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16-png.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5-png.png
is it correct? I'm not sure!
but what I do after that?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_13-44-25.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-44-25.png
    839 bytes · Views: 447
zahra95 said:
I think the equation is :View attachment 95040because <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34-png.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16-png.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5-png.png
is it correct? I'm not sure!
but what I do after that?

That's obviously not right. If you're stuck with an infinite sum, try a simple sum and see what happens. Try:
##\phi = A(\phi_0 + \frac{\phi_1}{3^4})##
 
upload_2016-1-30_14-35-2.png
and
upload_2016-1-30_14-40-12.png
for n = 0,1
= A^2(1+1/3^8 + 1/5^8 + 1/7^8 + ... )
then it is true that = A^2(1/(2n+1)^8) isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_14-34-18.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-34-18.png
    367 bytes · Views: 424
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-35-29.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-35-29.png
    318 bytes · Views: 418
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-2.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-2.png
    233 bytes · Views: 407
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-6.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-6.png
    233 bytes · Views: 435
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-19.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-19.png
    233 bytes · Views: 434
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-38-1.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-38-1.png
    529 bytes · Views: 434
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-38-45.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-38-45.png
    314 bytes · Views: 405
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-39-44.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-39-44.png
    543 bytes · Views: 389
Was that integral sign in post #3 a typo?

For the next bit, trying googling "sums of reciprocal powers".
 
  • Like
Likes zahra95
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top