Can the Uncertainty Principle Explain High Electron Energies in the Nucleus?

Kazuya
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a first year physics student at the University of Oregon and I was hoping that someone here might be able to help me with a problem I've been having.

A question on my assignment asks me to "Use the uncertainty principle to show that if an electron were present in the nucleus (r = approximately 10^-15 m), its kinetic energy (use relativity) would be hundreds of MeV. (Since such electron energies are not observed, we conclude that electrons are not present in the nucleus). [Hint: a particle can have energy as large as its uncertainty.]

Firstly, I decided to use the form of uncertainty principle (delta x)(delta p) is approximately larger than h-bar. I used (10^-15 m) as (delta x) and split (delta p) into m(delta v). I than used the rest mass of an electron (9.11x10^-31 kg) as m and attempted to solve for (delta v). [Using h-bar = 1.055x10^-34 J*s]. Unfortunately, this gave me an answer of (delta v) is approximately larger than (1.15x10^11 m/s)... which of course is much larger than c (3.00x10^8 m/s).

Already I knew there was a problem... when attempting to find K = (gamma - 1)mc^2, gamma becomes something like (382i)^-1/2. This is a definite problem because we haven't begun using non-real numbers (i) in this course yet.

Does anyone see an obvious problem with what I'm doing? Should I be using (delta E)(delta t) approximately larger than h-bar for the uncertainty principle? For my special relativity equation should I use E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4)?

I've spent several hours on this problem trying every imaginable route and have even come to the conclusion (incorrectly, of course) that [1+ (m^2)(c^2)] is approximately larger than 1/(2pi)^2! Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Kazuya
Hi, I'm a first year physics student at the University of Oregon and I was hoping that someone here might be able to help me with a problem I've been having.

A question on my assignment asks me to "Use the uncertainty principle to show that if an electron were present in the nucleus (r = approximately 10^-15 m), its kinetic energy (use relativity) would be hundreds of MeV. (Since such electron energies are not observed, we conclude that electrons are not present in the nucleus). [Hint: a particle can have energy as large as its uncertainty.]

Firstly, I decided to use the form of uncertainty principle (delta x)(delta p) is approximately larger than h-bar. I used (10^-15 m) as (delta x) and split (delta p) into m(delta v). I than used the rest mass of an electron (9.11x10^-31 kg) as m and attempted to solve for (delta v). [Using h-bar = 1.055x10^-34 J*s]. Unfortunately, this gave me an answer of (delta v) is approximately larger than (1.15x10^11 m/s)... which of course is much larger than c (3.00x10^8 m/s).

Already I knew there was a problem... when attempting to find K = (gamma - 1)mc^2, gamma becomes something like (382i)^-1/2. This is a definite problem because we haven't begun using non-real numbers (i) in this course yet.

Does anyone see an obvious problem with what I'm doing? Should I be using (delta E)(delta t) approximately larger than h-bar for the uncertainty principle? For my special relativity equation should I use E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4)?

I've spent several hours on this problem trying every imaginable route and have even come to the conclusion (incorrectly, of course) that [1+ (m^2)(c^2)] is approximately larger than 1/(2pi)^2! Any help is greatly appreciated.

You began well by saying that p is of the order of hbar/Δx.
Instead of finding the velocity of the electron just compare pc with mc^2. Why that? Remember that E = γmc^2 and p = γmv. So that p/E = v/c^2 and if the velocity is of the order of c, you get E is approximately equal to pc. When you put this result in the equation E^2 =(p^2)(c^2) + (m^2)(c^4), you see thatthis means that you can neglect mc^2 wrt pc. In fact there is a terminology for this. A particle is said to be ultra-relativistic if its velocity is so closed to c that it can be treated as a zero mass particle where E=pc.

In the case of ultra-relativistic, almost all the energy will be kinetic energy.

If you look at your example you have p = h/r so that Ek = hbar*c/r.
remember that the compton wavelength of the electron is given by λ = hbar/mc, you will find that Ek = λ/r*mc^2.
For the electron, &lambda is about 10^-12 m, r is about 10^-15 and mc^2 is 0.5 MeV. So you get Ek is about 500MeV.

Hope I could help
 
Awesome =) Thanks for the help!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top