Can there be collision-less acceleration of electrons?

AI Thread Summary
Electron cyclotron resonance allows for the acceleration of electrons in metals and solids, where the cyclotron frequency exceeds the collision rate. This means electrons can complete orbits before colliding, but collisions still occur. The discussion emphasizes the importance of citing sources to ensure accurate interpretation of scientific concepts. Misunderstandings can arise from misreading articles, highlighting the need for clarity in scientific communication. Accurate citations are crucial for validating claims in scientific discussions.
AAB1994
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
In electron cyclotron resonance of metals/solids can there be electron acceleration without them engaging in collision ? I read the last para of electron cyclotron resonance wikipedia page which stated this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AAB1994 said:
I read the last para of electron cyclotron resonance wikipedia page which stated this

You shouldn't say something like this in this forum without providing a directly link.

Zz.
 
It isn’t saying the electrons never collide. It is saying that the cyclotron frequency is higher than the collision rate so electrons can accomplish complete orbits between collisions.
 
As @Cutter Ketch has stated, it doesn't mean that there are no collisions. It means that the mean free path of the electrons is larger than the length it takes to make one complete orbit.

This clearly illustrates why we require exact citation of the sources. We don't know if you are reading a bad article, or if you're misreading and misinterpreting a correct article.

Zz.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top