Can time be a generalized coordinate?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of generalized coordinates in classical dynamics and whether time can be considered as a generalized coordinate. The general consensus is that time is not considered a quantity in the same sense as energy or length, but there is a small body of literature that explores the idea of time and energy as conjugate variables in an extended phase space. However, this approach is not widely used due to its limitations.
  • #1
Visceral
59
0
The title pretty much says it. According to my book, Classical Dynamics by Thornton and Marion, generalized coordinates can be quantities other than position such as energy or length squared, but what about time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Visceral said:
The title pretty much says it. According to my book, Classical Dynamics by Thornton and Marion, generalized coordinates can be quantities other than position such as energy or length squared, but what about time?
I guess, time is not a quantity in the sense of your book. It is the parameter parameterizing the dynamics.
 
  • #3
A. Neumaier said:
I guess, time is not a quantity in the sense of your book. It is the parameter parameterizing the dynamics.

I was just working on a problem the other day that had force as a function of position and time, and had to derive the potential and then the lagrangian and hamiltonian. So essentially, the answer is no?
 
  • #4
nlsherrill said:
I was just working on a problem the other day that had force as a function of position and time, and had to derive the potential and then the lagrangian and hamiltonian. So essentially, the answer is no?
The main stream view is indeed ''no''. But there is a trickle of literature (I don't remember precise references now) which works in extended pase spase where time and energy are anotherr pair of conjugate variables. However, this approach has its own pitfalls and is not widely used because of that.
Certainly it is not meant in your case unless your book explicitly discusses extended phase space.
 
  • #5


Yes, time can be considered a generalized coordinate in certain situations. In classical mechanics, generalized coordinates are defined as any set of independent variables that can fully describe the state of a system. This means that any quantity that can uniquely determine the position and motion of a system can be considered a generalized coordinate.

In some systems, time can be used as a generalized coordinate to describe the evolution of the system over time. For example, in a simple pendulum, the angle of displacement and the time elapsed can be used as generalized coordinates to fully describe the position and motion of the pendulum. In this case, time is treated as a coordinate on equal footing with other physical quantities.

However, it is important to note that time is not always a suitable generalized coordinate. In certain systems, such as those involving relativistic effects or quantum mechanics, time must be treated differently and cannot be considered a generalized coordinate in the traditional sense. In these cases, more advanced mathematical techniques must be used to accurately describe the behavior of the system.

In summary, while time can be considered a generalized coordinate in some cases, it is not a universal rule and must be carefully considered in the context of the specific system being studied.
 

FAQ: Can time be a generalized coordinate?

Can time be treated as a generalized coordinate in physics?

Yes, time can be treated as a generalized coordinate in certain physical systems. In classical mechanics, time is often considered as a parameter rather than a coordinate. However, in other areas of physics such as quantum mechanics, general relativity, and thermodynamics, time can be used as a generalized coordinate to describe the dynamics of a system.

What is a generalized coordinate?

A generalized coordinate is a variable that describes the position or state of a physical system. In classical mechanics, generalized coordinates are typically position and momentum, while in other areas of physics they may include other variables such as temperature, entropy, or electric charge.

How is time different from other generalized coordinates?

Time is unique as a generalized coordinate because it is a unidirectional variable that only moves forward. In contrast, other generalized coordinates such as position or momentum can move in both directions. Additionally, time is often considered as a continuous variable, while other generalized coordinates may be discrete.

What are the advantages of using time as a generalized coordinate?

Using time as a generalized coordinate allows for a more comprehensive understanding of a physical system's dynamics. It also allows for the application of mathematical tools such as Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, which can simplify the analysis of complex systems. Additionally, time as a generalized coordinate can help bridge the gap between different areas of physics, as it is a fundamental concept in many theories.

Are there any limitations to using time as a generalized coordinate?

While time can be a useful generalized coordinate, there are some limitations to its application. In some physical systems, time may not be the most appropriate variable to describe the dynamics, and other generalized coordinates may be more suitable. Additionally, there may be cases where time is not a continuous variable, such as in quantum mechanics, which can complicate its use as a generalized coordinate.

Similar threads

Back
Top