Can We Explore General Relativity in Laboratory Experiments?

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090720134239.htmI think this belongs in beyond, if not please move .

ScienceDaily (July 22, 2009) — Even Albert Einstein might have been impressed. His theory of general relativity, which describes how the gravity of a massive object, such as a star, can curve space and time, has been successfully used to predict such astronomical observations as the bending of starlight by the sun, small shifts in the orbit of the planet Mercury and the phenomenon known as gravitational lensing. Now, however, it may soon be possible to study the effects of general relativity in bench-top laboratory experiments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's an interesting article. Thanks for flagging it for us.
People at Lawrence Berkeley Lab have prepared special optical materials that bend light in ways that resemble how an intense gravitational field would. Like having a solid state black hole analog. Much safer to handle and to examine up close than a real black hole would be (if one could ever obtain one.)
 
wolram said:
I think this belongs in beyond, if not please move .
It does not. A condensed matter system is described by the same mathematical equation as an astrophysical one. There is nothing beyond the standard model here.
 
this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In post #549 here I answered: And then I was surprised by the comment of Tom, asking how the pairing was done. Well, I thought that I had discussed it in some thread in BSM, but after looking at it, it seems that I did only a few sparse remarks here and there. On other hand, people was not liking to interrupt the flow of the thread and I have been either contacted privately or suggested to open a new thread. So here it is. The development can be traced in some draft papers...
Back
Top