Can We Influence the Spin of Entangled Photons?

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to force one of the entanglement "twins" to have a particular spin? or at the least increase the probability of a photon having a particular spin?

Let me illustrate with an example:

Photon A and B are an entangled pair of photons (created by striking photon C on say a BBO crystal etc).

Alice is given photon A and Bob photon B.

is there a way in which we can increase the probability (from 50% to say 60%) of Alice's photon showing spin of +? (of course the entanglement would collapse as soon as interact with A)

Simply put: even if we have just one photon (assume no entanglement) can we influence it in such a way that when we measure we get spin (+)?

if we could do that, then information could be transmitted via the (supposed/hypothetical) "phenomena" of entanglement because photon B now can be used to "read" what was done t photon A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's not possible to change the probabilities in this way, and in fact there's a general proof that the laws of quantum field theory forbid us from using entanglement to transmit information faster than light, this proof is known as Eberhard's theorem (some other links about it can be found in [post=2068964]this post[/post]).
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top