Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

In summary, Dirac discusses the Fine Structure Constant of 1/137 in this video. Although Hans Bethe wrote a paper linking it to absolute zero, it was meant as a joke and caused some backlash. The equation does work, but it was later withdrawn.
  • #1
RobbyQ
25
11
In this video Dirac talks about the Fine Structure Constant 1/137.
Can we now explain why this is?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, we can't explain why it is (approximately) 1/137.
 
  • #3
But Hans Bethe wrote a paper showing that it was related to absolute zero $$ T_0=(1-\frac 2 \alpha )$$ where ## T_0## is absolute zero in Celsius and alpha the fine structure constant (G. Beck, H. Bethe & W. Riezler 1931: Naturwissenschaften 19, 39.)
 
  • Haha
Likes mattt and Demystifier
  • #4
He was making fun of Eddington. Pissed some people off. He was a tremendously interesting fellow...perhaps the most interesting I ever met. But the publication did finally get formally withdrawn.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier
  • #5
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
 
  • Wow
Likes Demystifier
  • #6
Quantum_Physics123 said:
I tested out the equation above on a calculator and it works!
It works, but that’s what makes it a good joke.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Demystifier

FAQ: Can we now explain the Fine Structure Constant?

What is the Fine Structure Constant?

The Fine Structure Constant, often denoted by the Greek letter alpha (α), is a dimensionless constant that characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. It is approximately equal to 1/137 and plays a crucial role in the equations of quantum electrodynamics (QED).

Why is the Fine Structure Constant important in physics?

The Fine Structure Constant is important because it determines the strength of the electromagnetic force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature. It influences the structure and behavior of atoms, the emission and absorption spectra of light, and the interactions between charged particles. Its precise value is critical for the accuracy of theoretical predictions in quantum mechanics and other fields of physics.

Can we derive the value of the Fine Structure Constant from first principles?

As of now, the value of the Fine Structure Constant cannot be derived from first principles. It is considered a fundamental constant of nature, meaning its value is determined experimentally. While various theories and models have attempted to explain its value, no universally accepted derivation has been achieved.

Has the value of the Fine Structure Constant changed over time?

Current scientific evidence suggests that the Fine Structure Constant has remained constant over time. Various astronomical and laboratory measurements have been conducted to detect any potential variation, but so far, no significant changes have been observed. This constancy supports the stability of the physical laws governing the universe.

Are there any theories that attempt to explain the Fine Structure Constant?

Several theories and hypotheses attempt to explain the Fine Structure Constant, including those involving higher dimensions, string theory, and varying physical constants. However, none of these theories have been proven or widely accepted in the scientific community. The Fine Structure Constant remains one of the unsolved mysteries of modern physics, and its exact origin and nature are still subjects of ongoing research.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
995
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top