Can You Prove this Specific Inequality Involving Positive Integers?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
In summary, the expression 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³ is a mathematical inequality where the value on the left side is greater than the value on the right side. To prove this inequality, one can simplify the expression and manipulate the variables using algebraic properties and logical reasoning. The constant 1983 serves as a reference point for comparison in the inequality. An example of this inequality is when specific values are plugged in for the variables, showing that it holds true. In the field of science, inequalities are used to establish relationships between variables and make quantitative comparisons, making them essential in scientific research and analysis.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Positive integers $l,\,k,\,m,\,n$ satisfying $l+m \le 1982$ and $\dfrac{l}{k}+\dfrac{m}{n}<1$. Prove that $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hint:

Let $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}=\dfrac{a}{kn}$ for some positive integer $a$. And see what happens if we let $a>n$ and $a\le n$.

The skill of using the concept of contradicting of minimality with respect to certain variable helps too.
 
  • #3
Solution of other:

Let us consider the general case with 1982 replaced by $P$. We have $l
\dfrac{1}{P}$. So there is no need in making $n$ too big.

Certainly we must have $n<2Pm<2P^2$. Similarly for $k$. So there are only finitely many candidates for $l,\,m,\,n,\,k$. Hence there is a set of values which minimizes $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}$. Let us adopt these values.

Clearly $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}=\dfrac{a}{kn}$ for some positive integer $a$. We may assume that $k>n$. The fact that $l,\,m,\,n,\,k$ is an optimal set means that $a$ cannot be too large. Multiplying across, $a=kn-ln-km$. So if $a>n$, we could increase $l$ by 1. That would reduce $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}$ to $\dfrac{a-n}{kn}$, contradicting minimality. So, $a\le n$.

Now, $kn=a+ln+km\le a+lk+km=a+k(l+m)\le a+kP$. Hence, $n\le P+\dfrac{a}{k}\le P+1$.

But $\dfrac{a}{kn}+\dfrac{l}{k}=1-\dfrac{m}{n}\ge \dfrac{1}{n}\ge \dfrac{1}{P+1}$.

We have $\dfrac{a}{kn}+\dfrac{l}{k}=\dfrac{1}{k(l+1)}\le \dfrac{1}{k(l+1)}\le \dfrac{1}{kP}$. So, $\dfrac{1}{k}\ge \dfrac{1}{P(P+1)}>\dfrac{1}{(P+1)^2}$.

Hence $1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}=\dfrac{a}{kn}>\dfrac{a}{(P+1)^3}\ge \dfrac{1}{(P+1)^3}=\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.
 
  • #4
I am thinking it would be nice to show another variant of the same problem that uses other method to tackle it...here goes the problem:

Let $l,\,k,\,m,\,n\in\Bbb{Z_+}$ and $a=1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}$. If $a>0$ and $l+m\le 1982$, then prove that $a>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.

We have 3 cases to analyze:

Case I: If $k,\,n\ge 1983$, then $a\ge 1-\dfrac{l+m}{1983}\ge 1-\dfrac{1982}{1983}>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.

Case II: if $k,\,n\le 1983$, then $a=\dfrac{kn-ln-km}{kn}>0$ so that $kn-ln-km \ge 1$. Thus, $a\ge \dfrac{1}{kn}>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.

Case III:

Suppose now that $k<1983<n$, if $n>1983^2$ and $a<\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$, then $\dfrac{m}{n}<\dfrac{1982}{1983}$, thus, $1-\dfrac{l}{k}<\dfrac{1}{1983}$. This implies that $k>1983(k-l)>1983$ because $l\le k+1$, which is absurd. If $n\le 1983^2$, then as in the case II above, we have $a\ge \dfrac{1}{kn}>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$.
 
  • #5


To prove the given statement, we will use the given conditions and properties of inequalities. First, we will rearrange the given inequality to get:

$1-\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{m}{n}>\dfrac{1}{1983^3}$

We can then multiply both sides by $k$ and $n$ to get:

$k\cdot n - l\cdot n - k\cdot m > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Next, we can use the given condition that $l+m \le 1982$ to substitute $l$ with $1982-m$ in the above inequality. This gives us:

$k\cdot n - (1982-m)\cdot n - k\cdot m > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Simplifying this, we get:

$1982\cdot n - k\cdot m > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Since $l+m \le 1982$, we know that $k\cdot m \le k\cdot (1982-m) = 1982k - k\cdot m$. This means that $1982\cdot n - k\cdot m \ge 1982\cdot n - (1982k - k\cdot m) = 1982\cdot n - 1982k + k\cdot m$. Substituting this into our previous inequality, we get:

$1982\cdot n - 1982k + k\cdot m > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Next, we can use the given condition that $\dfrac{l}{k} + \dfrac{m}{n} < 1$ to substitute $\dfrac{l}{k}$ with $1-\dfrac{m}{n}$ in the above inequality. This gives us:

$1982\cdot n - 1982k + k\cdot (1-\dfrac{m}{n}) > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Simplifying this, we get:

$1982\cdot n - 1982k + k - k\cdot \dfrac{m}{n} > \dfrac{k\cdot n}{1983^3}$

Finally, we can use the property that $k\cdot
 

FAQ: Can You Prove this Specific Inequality Involving Positive Integers?

What does the expression 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³ mean?

The expression 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³ is a mathematical inequality, where l, k, m, and n are variables and 1983 is a constant. It means that the value on the left side of the inequality is greater than the value on the right side.

How do you prove 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³?

To prove this inequality, you can start by simplifying the expression on both sides and then manipulating the variables to show that the statement is true for all possible values of l, k, m, and n. You may also use algebraic properties and logical reasoning to reach a conclusion.

What is the significance of the constant 1983 in the expression?

The constant 1983 serves as a reference point for comparison in the inequality. It is a specific value that is used to demonstrate the relationship between the variables l, k, m, and n. In this case, it is used to show that the left side of the inequality is greater than a very small number (1/1983³).

Can you provide an example to illustrate the inequality 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³?

Let's say that l=2, k=3, m=4, and n=5. Plugging these values into the expression, we get 1-2/3-4/5>1/1983³. Simplifying further, we get 1/15>1/1983³, which is true since 1983³ is a much larger number than 15.

How is this inequality relevant in the field of science?

Inequalities like 1-l/k-m/n>1/1983³ are used in various scientific fields to establish relationships between variables and to make quantitative comparisons. For example, in physics, inequalities are used to describe the relationship between different physical quantities such as force, mass, and acceleration. In chemistry, they are used to express the ratio of reactants and products in a chemical reaction. In statistics, inequalities are used to describe the probability of an event occurring. Therefore, understanding and applying inequalities is crucial in scientific research and analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
872
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
999
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
929
Replies
1
Views
892
Back
Top