Capacitance of three concentric shells

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the capacitance between three concentric shells, charge Q is applied to the outer shell and -Q to the innermost shell. The potential V is determined by integrating the electric field, resulting in V=kq[1/a -1/c]. The capacitance C is then calculated as C=Q/V, and this method is confirmed to be correct as the middle shell acts as an equipotential surface, not affecting the capacitance. An alternative scenario is proposed, involving a thick concentric shell with a specific wall thickness, which could provide a more complex challenge. Overall, the approach to finding capacitance remains valid without the need for integration.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Homework Statement
A friend of mine sent me this problem about finding the capacitance.
We have three concentric shells of radius a, b, c. And we've to find the capacitance between x and y.

I need help.

Thank you
Relevant Equations
C=Q/V
IMG-20230727-WA0003.jpg


I want to calculate the capacitance of this system between the points x&y.
So suppose I give a charge Q to the outermost shell and -Q to the innermost shell. To find the capacitance C, I try to find the potential V between the outermost shell and innermost shell .
To find V ,I integrate the electric field and find it out to be V=kq[1/a -1/c] where k=1/(4 *pi*epsilon). Then I can find C =Q/V.
Is this approach correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This approach is correct. You should get the capacitance between the outer and inner shells the usual way as if the middle shell were not there. The middle shell is affecting nothing because it is an equipotential surface at the potential that would be there if there were vacuum between the shells.

A slightly more interesting problem might be to find the capacitance if a thick concentric shell were placed in between having wall thickness, say ##d=\frac{1}{2}(c-a)## with equal vacuum gaps between conductors.
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir and berkeman
kuruman said:
This approach is correct. You should get the capacitance between the outer and inner shells the usual way as if the middle shell were not there. The middle shell is affecting nothing because it is an equipotential surface at the potential that would be there if there were vacuum between the shells.

A slightly more interesting problem might be to find the capacitance if a thick concentric shell were placed in between having wall thickness, say ##d=\frac{1}{2}(c-a)## with equal vacuum gaps between conductors.
Thank you. I’ll try your question :)
 
You don't need to do any integration. Just write down the potential at radius a due to the two shells. You know that the potential due to the outer shell there is the same as it is at radius c.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top