Capacitance (why are the charges no the same?)

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed circuit, capacitor C1 is charged and then connected to uncharged capacitor C2 after switch S1 is opened. The key point is that when S2 is closed, the two capacitors are in parallel, resulting in the same voltage across both capacitors. This means that while the voltage remains equal, the charge on each capacitor can differ, as the total charge is conserved and equals the initial charge on C1. In contrast, when capacitors are connected in series, the charge remains the same across them, leading to different voltages. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of capacitors in different configurations.
360705474
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the circuit shown in the attachment. Capacitor C1 is first charged by closing switch S1. Switch S1 is then opened, and the charged capacitor is connected to the uncharged capacitor by closing S2. Calculate the initial charge acquired by C1 and the final charge on each capacitor.
C1= 6.00 μF
C2= 3.00 μF
V=20.0 V

The Attempt at a Solution



This is a question from College physics book on Capacitance. I managed to solve the first subquestion. To find the final charge on each capacitor, I used Q is the same for both the capacitors after S2 is closed and S1 is open. However, the sample answer suggested that Q is different while the voltage across the capacitors are the same. I am very confused here. Because the circuit is not a close circuit (as S1 is open), I assume this situation is the same as you connect these 2 capacitors in series? Then isn't it that the charge should be the same? If not, I will be very thankful if you could help me explain it! Thank you :)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    3.6 KB · Views: 435
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,

Actually the situation is that the two capacitors are in parallel. As a result, the voltage across them must be the same. If you think about it, suppose if the voltage across them weren't the same: then the electric fields across them would be different. This would be an unbalanced situation with a net electric field: charge would be transferred from the plates of one capacitor to the other until this net field disappeared (and the voltages were hence equal).
 
Yes the voltage must be the same - apply KVL around the right hand loop when S1 made.

The total charge eg sum of charge on both capacitors at the end, will equal the charge originally on C1.
 
cepheid said:
Welcome to PF,

Actually the situation is that the two capacitors are in parallel. As a result, the voltage across them must be the same. If you think about it, suppose if the voltage across them weren't the same: then the electric fields across them would be different. This would be an unbalanced situation with a net electric field: charge would be transferred from the plates of one capacitor to the other until this net field disappeared (and the voltages were hence equal).

But why the voltage is different when the capacitors are connected in series? Won't the charges move then?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top